Unimodal Mono-Partite Matching in a Bandit Setting
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We tackle a new emerging problem, which is finding an optimal monopartite matching in a weighted graph. The semi-bandit version, where a full matching is sampled at each iteration, has been addressed by citeADMA, creating an algorithm with an expected regret matching O(fracLlog(L)Deltalog(T)) with 2L players, T iterations and a minimum reward gap Delta. We reduce this bound in two steps. First, as in citeGRAB and citeUniRank we use the unimodality property of the expected reward on the appropriate graph to design an algorithm with a regret in O(Lfrac1Deltalog(T)). Secondly, we show that by moving the focus towards the main question `Is user i better than user j?' this regret becomes O(LfracDeltatildeDelta2log(T)), where TildeDelta > Delta derives from a better way of comparing users. Some experimental results finally show these theoretical results are corroborated in practice.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Aug 2022.
Builds on
6 of 17 references.
References · 6
- 2018Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 78
- 2014Unimodal Bandits: Regret Lower Bounds and Optimal Algorithmscited by 36
- 2020Statistical Efficiency of Thompson Sampling for Combinatorial Semi-Banditscited by 30
- 2016Combinatorial semi-bandit with known covariancecited by 24
- 2020Statistically Efficient, Polynomial Time Algorithms for Combinatorial Semi Banditscited by 11
- 2021Pure Exploration and Regret Minimization in Matching Banditscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.