Transfer Learning for Segmentation Problems: Choose the Right Encoder and Skip the Decoder
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is common practice to reuse models initially trained on different data to increase downstream task performance. Especially in the computer vision domain, ImageNet-pretrained weights have been successfully used for various tasks. In this work, we investigate the impact of transfer learning for segmentation problems, being pixel-wise classification problems that can be tackled with encoder-decoder architectures. We find that transfer learning the decoder does not help downstream segmentation tasks, while transfer learning the encoder is truly beneficial. We demonstrate that pretrained weights for a decoder may yield faster convergence, but they do not improve the overall model performance as one can obtain equivalent results with randomly initialized decoders. However, we show that it is more effective to reuse encoder weights trained on a segmentation or reconstruction task than reusing encoder weights trained on classification tasks. This finding implicates that using ImageNet-pretrained encoders for downstream segmentation problems is suboptimal. We also propose a contrastive self-supervised approach with multiple self-reconstruction tasks, which provides encoders that are suitable for transfer learning in segmentation problems in the absence of segmentation labels.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jul 2022.
Builds on
18 of 24 references.
References · 18
- 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2019Momentum Contrast for Unsupervised Visual Representation Learningcited by 7,513
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2020Bootstrap your own latent: A new approach to self-supervised Learningcited by 4,750
- 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,444
- 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,375
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
- 2016Context Encoders: Feature Learning by Inpaintingcited by 1,428
- 2020Big Self-Supervised Models are Strong Semi-Supervised Learnerscited by 1,380
- 2021iBOT: Image BERT Pre-Training with Online Tokenizercited by 903
- 2020Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 660
6 more
- 2022MultiMAE: Multi-modal Multi-task Masked Autoencoderscited by 291
- 2019Models Genesis: Generic Autodidactic Models for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 159
- 2020BYOL works even without batch statisticscited by 95
- 2021Preservational Learning Improves Self-supervised Medical Image Models by Reconstructing Diverse Contextscited by 60
- 2020Learning Semantics-enriched Representation via Self-discovery, Self-classification, and Self-restorationcited by 35
- 2021Towards Fine-grained Visual Representations by Combining Contrastive Learning with Image Reconstruction and Attention-weighted Poolingcited by 13
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2026: 1.
1 paper.