mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Shell Structures

arXiv 2207.14291 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2022cs.CE cs.LGcited by 12

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The numerical modeling of thin shell structures is a challenge, which has been met by a variety of finite element (FE) and other formulations -- many of which give rise to new challenges, from complex implementations to artificial locking. As a potential alternative, we use machine learning and present a Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) to predict the small-strain response of arbitrarily curved shells. To this end, the shell midsurface is described by a chart, from which the mechanical fields are derived in a curvilinear coordinate frame by adopting Naghdi's shell theory. Unlike in typical PINN applications, the corresponding strong or weak form must therefore be solved in a non-Euclidean domain. We investigate the performance of the proposed PINN in three distinct scenarios, including the well-known Scordelis-Lo roof setting widely used to test FE shell elements against locking. Results show that the PINN can accurately identify the solution field in all three benchmarks if the equations are presented in their weak form, while it may fail to do so when using the strong form. In the thin-thickness limit, where classical methods are susceptible to locking, training time notably increases as the differences in scaling of the membrane, shear, and bending energies lead to adverse numerical stiffness in the gradient flow dynamics. Nevertheless, the PINN can accurately match the ground truth and performs well in the Scordelis-Lo roof benchmark, highlighting its potential for a drastically simplified alternative to designing locking-free shell FE formulations.

Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2022.

Builds on

14 of 39 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  3. 2016Gaussian Error Linear Units (GELUs)cited by 3,431
  4. 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 632
  5. 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 629
  6. 2017The Deep Ritz method: A deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problemscited by 581
  7. 2021Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) for fluid mechanics: A reviewcited by 470
  8. 2021Exact imposition of boundary conditions with distance functions in physics-informed deep neural networkscited by 135
  9. 2020Understanding and mitigating gradient pathologies in physics-informed neural networkscited by 134
  10. 2020Solving Allen-Cahn and Cahn-Hilliard Equations using the Adaptive Physics Informed Neural Networkscited by 122
  11. 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating a class of inverse problems for PDEscited by 101
  12. 2020A Physics-Guided Neural Network Framework for Elastic Plates: Comparison of Governing Equations-Based and Energy-Based Approachescited by 34
2 more
  1. 2020Data-driven topology optimization of spinodoid metamaterials with seamlessly tunable anisotropycited by 22
  2. 2020Deep Autoencoder based Energy Method for the Bending, Vibration, and Buckling Analysis of Kirchhoff Platescited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 2.

12 papers.