mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AMF: Adaptable Weighting Fusion with Multiple Fine-tuning for Image Classification

arXiv 2207.12944 ↗First posted 26 Jul 2022cs.CVcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Fine-tuning is widely applied in image classification tasks as a transfer learning approach. It re-uses the knowledge from a source task to learn and obtain a high performance in target tasks. Fine-tuning is able to alleviate the challenge of insufficient training data and expensive labelling of new data. However, standard fine-tuning has limited performance in complex data distributions. To address this issue, we propose the Adaptable Multi-tuning method, which adaptively determines each data sample's fine-tuning strategy. In this framework, multiple fine-tuning settings and one policy network are defined. The policy network in Adaptable Multi-tuning can dynamically adjust to an optimal weighting to feed different samples into models that are trained using different fine-tuning strategies. Our method outperforms the standard fine-tuning approach by 1.69%, 2.79% on the datasets FGVC-Aircraft, and Describable Texture, yielding comparable performance on the datasets Stanford Cars, CIFAR-10, and Fashion-MNIST.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Jul 2022.

Builds on

26 of 42 references.

References · 26

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,442
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,349
  4. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  5. 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,269
  6. 2013Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentationcited by 2,162
  7. 2013Describing Textures in the Wildcited by 2,125
  8. 2013Fine-Grained Visual Classification of Aircraftcited by 1,726
  9. 2016Inception-v4, Inception-ResNet and the Impact of Residual Connections on Learningcited by 1,512
  10. 2014How transferable are features in deep neural networks?cited by 1,225
  11. 2017Revisiting Unreasonable Effectiveness of Data in Deep Learning Eracited by 919
  12. 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 769
14 more
  1. 2018Exploring the Limits of Weakly Supervised Pretrainingcited by 605
  2. 2018Do Better ImageNet Models Transfer Better?cited by 565
  3. 2013DeCAF: A Deep Convolutional Activation Feature for Generic Visual Recognitioncited by 424
  4. 2018Rethinking ImageNet Pre-trainingcited by 377
  5. 2020Multi-Task Learning with Deep Neural Networks: A Surveycited by 375
  6. 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 368
  7. 2014CNN Features off-the-shelf: an Astounding Baseline for Recognitioncited by 316
  8. 2016What makes ImageNet good for transfer learning?cited by 192
  9. 2018SpotTune: Transfer Learning through Adaptive Fine-tuningcited by 168
  10. 2019Transferability and Hardness of Supervised Classification Taskscited by 127
  11. 2021DSelect-k: Differentiable Selection in the Mixture of Experts with Applications to Multi-Task Learningcited by 115
  12. 2020Rethinking the Hyperparameters for Fine-tuningcited by 69
  13. 2019Towards Understanding the Transferability of Deep Representationscited by 12
  14. 2021Non-binary deep transfer learning for image classificationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.