Technical Report: Assisting Backdoor Federated Learning with Whole Population Knowledge Alignment
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Due to the distributed nature of Federated Learning (FL), researchers have uncovered that FL is vulnerable to backdoor attacks, which aim at injecting a sub-task into the FL without corrupting the performance of the main task. Single-shot backdoor attack achieves high accuracy on both the main task and backdoor sub-task when injected at the FL model convergence. However, the early-injected single-shot backdoor attack is ineffective because: (1) the maximum backdoor effectiveness is not reached at injection because of the dilution effect from normal local updates; (2) the backdoor effect decreases quickly as the backdoor will be overwritten by the newcoming normal local updates. In this paper, we strengthen the early-injected single-shot backdoor attack utilizing FL model information leakage. We show that the FL convergence can be expedited if the client trains on a dataset that mimics the distribution and gradients of the whole population. Based on this observation, we proposed a two-phase backdoor attack, which includes a preliminary phase for the subsequent backdoor attack. In the preliminary phase, the attacker-controlled client first launches a whole population distribution inference attack and then trains on a locally crafted dataset that is aligned with both the gradient and inferred distribution. Benefiting from the preliminary phase, the later injected backdoor achieves better effectiveness as the backdoor effect will be less likely to be diluted by the normal model updates. Extensive experiments are conducted on MNIST dataset under various data heterogeneity settings to evaluate the effectiveness of the proposed backdoor attack. Results show that the proposed backdoor outperforms existing backdoor attacks in both success rate and longevity, even when defense mechanisms are in place.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 35 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2022.
Builds on
23 of 35 references.
References · 23
- 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,669
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2016Federated Learning: Strategies for Improving Communication Efficiencycited by 1,475
- 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,108
- 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 711
- 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 572
- 2018Exploiting Unintended Feature Leakage in Collaborative Learningcited by 520
- 2017Deep Models Under the GAN: Information Leakage from Collaborative Deep Learningcited by 334
- 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 329
- 2019Robust Aggregation for Federated Learningcited by 317
- 2020Attack of the Tails: Yes, You Really Can Backdoor Federated Learningcited by 309
- 2019Can You Really Backdoor Federated Learning?cited by 255
11 more
- 2018Applied Federated Learning: Improving Google Keyboard Query Suggestionscited by 204
- 2018Mitigating Sybils in Federated Learning Poisoningcited by 161
- 2013Hacking Smart Machines with Smarter Ones: How to Extract Meaningful Data from Machine Learning Classifierscited by 130
- 2019Federated Learning for Emoji Prediction in a Mobile Keyboardcited by 118
- 2020Learning to Detect Malicious Clients for Robust Federated Learningcited by 88
- 2020Local and Central Differential Privacy for Robustness and Privacy in Federated Learningcited by 78
- 2018Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated Learningcited by 77
- 2019Federated Learning Of Out-Of-Vocabulary Wordscited by 51
- 2019Eavesdrop the Composition Proportion of Training Labels in Federated Learningcited by 27
- 2018Biscotti: A Ledger for Private and Secure Peer-to-Peer Machine Learningcited by 17
- 2018Gradient-Leaks: Understanding and Controlling Deanonymization in Federated Learningcited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.
3 papers.
- 2023Backdoor Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning: Survey, Challenges and Future Research Directionscited by 33
- 2023A Survey of Trustworthy Federated Learning with Perspectives on Security, Robustness, and Privacycited by 24
- 2025FL-CLEANER: byzantine and backdoor defense by CLustering Errors of Activation maps in Non-iid fedErated leaRningcited by 0
- 2025FL-CLEANER: byzantine and backdoor defense by CLustering Errors of Activation maps in Non-iid fedErated leaRning21 Jan 2025
- 2023Backdoor Attacks and Defenses in Federated Learning: Survey, Challenges and Future Research Directions3 Mar 2023
- 2023A Survey of Trustworthy Federated Learning with Perspectives on Security, Robustness, and Privacy21 Feb 2023
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2023On the Vulnerability of Backdoor Defenses for Federated Learning
- 2025BackFed: An Efficient & Standardized Benchmark Suite for Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning
- 2025Enhancing the Effectiveness and Durability of Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning through Maximizing Task Distinction
- 2022Sniper Backdoor: Single Client Targeted Backdoor Attack in Federated Learning
- 2023FedGrad: Mitigating Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning Through Local Ultimate Gradients Inspection
- 2023Mitigating Backdoors in Federated Learning with FLD
- 2024Securing Federated Learning against Backdoor Threats with Foundation Model Integration
- 2024Non-Cooperative Backdoor Attacks in Federated Learning: A New Threat Landscape