mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Is GPT-3 all you need for Visual Question Answering in Cultural Heritage?

arXiv 2207.12101 ↗First posted 25 Jul 2022cs.CV cs.CLcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The use of Deep Learning and Computer Vision in the Cultural Heritage domain is becoming highly relevant in the last few years with lots of applications about audio smart guides, interactive museums and augmented reality. All these technologies require lots of data to work effectively and be useful for the user. In the context of artworks, such data is annotated by experts in an expensive and time consuming process. In particular, for each artwork, an image of the artwork and a description sheet have to be collected in order to perform common tasks like Visual Question Answering. In this paper we propose a method for Visual Question Answering that allows to generate at runtime a description sheet that can be used for answering both visual and contextual questions about the artwork, avoiding completely the image and the annotation process. For this purpose, we investigate on the use of GPT-3 for generating descriptions for artworks analyzing the quality of generated descriptions through captioning metrics. Finally we evaluate the performance for Visual Question Answering and captioning tasks.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jul 2022.

Builds on

23 of 39 references.

References · 23

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  3. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
  4. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,617
  5. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,243
  6. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,115
  7. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,489
  8. 2014CIDEr: Consensus-based Image Description Evaluationcited by 2,027
  9. 2019LXMERT: Learning Cross-Modality Encoder Representations from Transformerscited by 1,548
  10. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,310
  11. 2020Oscar: Object-Semantics Aligned Pre-training for Vision-Language Taskscited by 1,213
  12. 2019VL-BERT: Pre-training of Generic Visual-Linguistic Representationscited by 954
11 more
  1. 2022OFA: Unifying Architectures, Tasks, and Modalities Through a Simple Sequence-to-Sequence Learning Frameworkcited by 742
  2. 2019Meshed-Memory Transformer for Image Captioningcited by 343
  3. 2021An Empirical Study of GPT-3 for Few-Shot Knowledge-Based VQAcited by 298
  4. 2016Hierarchical Question-Image Co-Attention for Visual Question Answeringcited by 278
  5. 2016Improved Image Captioning via Policy Gradient optimization of SPIDErcited by 112
  6. 2015Where To Look: Focus Regions for Visual Question Answeringcited by 64
  7. 2021Understanding and Creating Art with AI: Review and Outlookcited by 60
  8. 2021Paradigm Shift in Natural Language Processingcited by 39
  9. 2020A Dataset and Baselines for Visual Question Answering on Artcited by 38
  10. 2021Visual Question Answering: which investigated applications?cited by 11
  11. 2020Visual Question Answering for Cultural Heritagecited by 8

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 0; 2025: 1.

6 papers.