mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Visual Perturbation-aware Collaborative Learning for Overcoming the Language Prior Problem

arXiv 2207.11850 ↗First posted 24 Jul 2022cs.CVcited by 18

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Several studies have recently pointed that existing Visual Question Answering (VQA) models heavily suffer from the language prior problem, which refers to capturing superficial statistical correlations between the question type and the answer whereas ignoring the image contents. Numerous efforts have been dedicated to strengthen the image dependency by creating the delicate models or introducing the extra visual annotations. However, these methods cannot sufficiently explore how the visual cues explicitly affect the learned answer representation, which is vital for language reliance alleviation. Moreover, they generally emphasize the class-level discrimination of the learned answer representation, which overlooks the more fine-grained instance-level patterns and demands further optimization. In this paper, we propose a novel collaborative learning scheme from the viewpoint of visual perturbation calibration, which can better investigate the fine-grained visual effects and mitigate the language prior problem by learning the instance-level characteristics. Specifically, we devise a visual controller to construct two sorts of curated images with different perturbation extents, based on which the collaborative learning of intra-instance invariance and inter-instance discrimination is implemented by two well-designed discriminators. Besides, we implement the information bottleneck modulator on latent space for further bias alleviation and representation calibration. We impose our visual perturbation-aware framework to three orthodox baselines and the experimental results on two diagnostic VQA-CP benchmark datasets evidently demonstrate its effectiveness. In addition, we also justify its robustness on the balanced VQA benchmark.

Key facts. Cited by 18 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 58 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jul 2022.

Builds on

43 of 58 references.

References · 43

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,608
  3. 2015Faster R-CNN: Towards Real-Time Object Detection with Region Proposal Networkscited by 9,639
  4. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,733
  5. 2014Learning Phrase Representations using RNN Encoder-Decoder for Statistical Machine Translationcited by 4,057
  6. 2015VQA: Visual Question Answeringcited by 2,506
  7. 2017Bottom-Up and Top-Down Attention for Image Captioning and Visual Question Answeringcited by 1,312
  8. 2019OK-VQA: A Visual Question Answering Benchmark Requiring External Knowledgecited by 1,121
  9. 2016Deep Variational Information Bottleneckcited by 930
  10. 2015Neural Module Networkscited by 376
  11. 2017Don't Just Assume; Look and Answer: Overcoming Priors for Visual Question Answeringcited by 339
  12. 2018Bilinear Attention Networkscited by 280
31 more
  1. 2019Don't Take the Easy Way Out: Ensemble Based Methods for Avoiding Known Dataset Biasescited by 280
  2. 2016Hierarchical Question-Image Co-Attention for Visual Question Answeringcited by 278
  3. 2015Stacked Attention Networks for Image Question Answeringcited by 273
  4. 2020Counterfactual VQA: A Cause-Effect Look at Language Biascited by 266
  5. 2016Multimodal Compact Bilinear Pooling for Visual Question Answering and Visual Groundingcited by 243
  6. 2019RUBi: Reducing Unimodal Biases in Visual Question Answeringcited by 185
  7. 2016FVQA: Fact-based Visual Question Answeringcited by 181
  8. 2018Multimodal Explanations: Justifying Decisions and Pointing to the Evidencecited by 179
  9. 2020Counterfactual Samples Synthesizing for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 153
  10. 2019Taking a HINT: Leveraging Explanations to Make Vision and Language Models More Groundedcited by 128
  11. 2017Learning to Reason: End-to-End Module Networks for Visual Question Answeringcited by 125
  12. 2019Relation-Aware Graph Attention Network for Visual Question Answeringcited by 119
  13. 2018Dynamic Fusion with Intra- and Inter- Modality Attention Flow for Visual Question Answeringcited by 114
  14. 2016Human Attention in Visual Question Answering: Do Humans and Deep Networks Look at the Same Regions?cited by 111
  15. 2018Overcoming Language Priors in Visual Question Answering with Adversarial Regularizationcited by 105
  16. 2018Explainable and Explicit Visual Reasoning over Scene Graphscited by 103
  17. 2020On the Value of Out-of-Distribution Testing: An Example of Goodhart's Lawcited by 74
  18. 2019BLOCK: Bilinear Superdiagonal Fusion for Visual Question Answering and Visual Relationship Detectioncited by 62
  19. 2019Self-Critical Reasoning for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 61
  20. 2020Mucko: Multi-Layer Cross-Modal Knowledge Reasoning for Fact-based Visual Question Answeringcited by 51
  21. 2018Learning Conditioned Graph Structures for Interpretable Visual Question Answeringcited by 45
  22. 2020Overcoming Language Priors with Self-supervised Learning for Visual Question Answeringcited by 43
  23. 2018Learning to Count Objects in Natural Images for Visual Question Answeringcited by 40
  24. 2020Loss re-scaling VQA: Revisiting the LanguagePrior Problem from a Class-imbalance Viewcited by 36
  25. 2020Reducing Language Biases in Visual Question Answering with Visually-Grounded Question Encodercited by 34
  26. 2021Greedy Gradient Ensemble for Robust Visual Question Answeringcited by 34
  27. 2017Visual Question Answering with Memory-Augmented Networkscited by 25
  28. 2021AdaVQA: Overcoming Language Priors with Adapted Margin Cosine Losscited by 18
  29. 2021LPF: A Language-Prior Feedback Objective Function for De-biased Visual Question Answeringcited by 17
  30. 2019Explanation vs Attention: A Two-Player Game to Obtain Attention for VQAcited by 12
  31. 2019Actively Seeking and Learning from Live Datacited by 9

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 5; 2025: 7; 2026: 5.

18 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2023Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Visual Contrastive Decodingcited by 688
  2. 2024IBD: Alleviating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models via Image-Biased Decodingcited by 118
  3. 2024Mitigating Object Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models with Assembly of Global and Local Attentioncited by 74
  4. 2024Reducing Hallucinations in Vision-Language Models via Latent Space Steeringcited by 59
  5. 2025ClearSight: Visual Signal Enhancement for Object Hallucination Mitigation in Multimodal Large language Modelscited by 40
  6. 2024ICT: Image-Object Cross-Level Trusted Intervention for Mitigating Object Hallucination in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 30
  7. 2025Mitigating Object Hallucinations via Sentence-Level Early Interventioncited by 28
  8. 2024From Introspection to Best Practices: Principled Analysis of Demonstrations in Multimodal In-Context Learningcited by 11
  9. 2025The Mirage of Performance Gains: Why Contrastive Decoding Fails to Mitigate Object Hallucinations in MLLMs?cited by 9
  10. 2025HalLoc: Token-level Localization of Hallucinations for Vision Language Modelscited by 9
  11. 2025Mitigating Hallucinations via Inter-Layer Consistency Aggregation in Large Vision-Language Modelscited by 7
  12. 2025Improving Alignment in LVLMs with Debiased Self-Judgmentcited by 3
6 more
  1. 2026Towards Interpretable Hallucination Analysis and Mitigation in LVLMs via Contrastive Neuron Steeringcited by 3
  2. 2026SeeMe: Mitigating Hallucinations in Large Vision-Language Models through Effective Visual Token Engineeringcited by 2
  3. 2025Watermarking for Factuality: Guiding Vision-Language Models Toward Truth via Tri-layer Contrastive Decodingcited by 0
  4. 2026Self-Correction Inside the Model: Leveraging Layer Attention to Mitigate Hallucinations in Large Vision Language Modelscited by 0
  5. 2026Reducing Object Hallucination in LVLMs via Emphasizing Image-negative Tokenscited by 0
  6. 2026Vision-driven Preference Synthesis for Mitigating Hallucinations in VLMscited by 0