mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Characterizing Coherent Integrated Photonic Neural Networks under Imperfections

arXiv 2207.10835 ↗First posted 22 Jul 2022cs.ET cs.LG eess.SPcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Integrated photonic neural networks (IPNNs) are emerging as promising successors to conventional electronic AI accelerators as they offer substantial improvements in computing speed and energy efficiency. In particular, coherent IPNNs use arrays of Mach-Zehnder interferometers (MZIs) for unitary transformations to perform energy-efficient matrix-vector multiplication. However, the underlying MZI devices in IPNNs are susceptible to uncertainties stemming from optical lithographic variations and thermal crosstalk and can experience imprecisions due to non-uniform MZI insertion loss and quantization errors due to low-precision encoding in the tuned phase angles. In this paper, we, for the first time, systematically characterize the impact of such uncertainties and imprecisions (together referred to as imperfections) in IPNNs using a bottom-up approach. We show that their impact on IPNN accuracy can vary widely based on the tuned parameters (e.g., phase angles) of the affected components, their physical location, and the nature and distribution of the imperfections. To improve reliability measures, we identify critical IPNN building blocks that, under imperfections, can lead to catastrophic degradation in the classification accuracy. We show that under multiple simultaneous imperfections, the IPNN inferencing accuracy can degrade by up to 46%, even when the imperfection parameters are restricted within a small range. Our results also indicate that the inferencing accuracy is sensitive to imperfections affecting the MZIs in the linear layers next to the input layer of the IPNN.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 65 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jul 2022.

Builds on

7 of 65 references.

References · 7

  1. 2020The Computational Limits of Deep Learningcited by 193
  2. 2020A Survey of Deep Learning for Scientific Discoverycited by 36
  3. 2021A Survey on Silicon Photonics for Deep Learningcited by 23
  4. 2019Design of optical neural networks with component imprecisionscited by 10
  5. 2020Modeling Silicon-Photonic Neural Networks under Uncertaintiescited by 7
  6. 2021Pruning Coherent Integrated Photonic Neural Networks Using the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 3
  7. 2021CHAMP: Coherent Hardware-Aware Magnitude Pruning of Integrated Photonic Neural Networkscited by 2

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.

4 papers.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2023Integrated multi-operand optical neurons for scalable and hardware-efficient deep learning
  2. 2021A compact butterfly-style silicon photonic-electronic neural chip for hardware-efficient deep learning
  3. 2026Inverse-designed meta processing units for multi-task near-field photonic computing
  4. 2024Streamlined optical training of large-scale modern deep learning architectures with direct feedback alignment
  5. 2024TeMPO: Efficient Time-Multiplexed Dynamic Photonic Tensor Core for Edge AI with Compact Slow-Light Electro-Optic Modulator
  6. 2026Constrained Co-Design for Photonic Bayesian Neural Networks
  7. 2021ROBIN: A Robust Optical Binary Neural Network Accelerator
  8. 2024High-Performance Data Mapping for BNNs on PCM-based Integrated Photonics ↗