mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Strategising template-guided needle placement for MR-targeted prostate biopsy

arXiv 2207.10784 ↗First posted 21 Jul 2022cs.LG cs.CV eess.IVcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clinically significant prostate cancer has a better chance to be sampled during ultrasound-guided biopsy procedures, if suspected lesions found in pre-operative magnetic resonance (MR) images are used as targets. However, the diagnostic accuracy of the biopsy procedure is limited by the operator-dependent skills and experience in sampling the targets, a sequential decision making process that involves navigating an ultrasound probe and placing a series of sampling needles for potentially multiple targets. This work aims to learn a reinforcement learning (RL) policy that optimises the actions of continuous positioning of 2D ultrasound views and biopsy needles with respect to a guiding template, such that the MR targets can be sampled efficiently and sufficiently. We first formulate the task as a Markov decision process (MDP) and construct an environment that allows the targeting actions to be performed virtually for individual patients, based on their anatomy and lesions derived from MR images. A patient-specific policy can thus be optimised, before each biopsy procedure, by rewarding positive sampling in the MDP environment. Experiment results from fifty four prostate cancer patients show that the proposed RL-learned policies obtained a mean hit rate of 93% and an average cancer core length of 11 mm, which compared favourably to two alternative baseline strategies designed by humans, without hand-engineered rewards that directly maximise these clinically relevant metrics. Perhaps more interestingly, it is found that the RL agents learned strategies that were adaptive to the lesion size, where spread of the needles was prioritised for smaller lesions. Such a strategy has not been previously reported or commonly adopted in clinical practice, but led to an overall superior targeting performance when compared with intuitively designed strategies.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jul 2022.

Builds on

7 of 27 references.

References · 7

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2018Soft Actor-Critic: Off-Policy Maximum Entropy Deep Reinforcement Learning with a Stochastic Actorcited by 4,885
  4. 2015Continuous control with deep reinforcement learningcited by 3,407
  5. 2018Weakly-Supervised Convolutional Neural Networks for Multimodal Image Registrationcited by 90
  6. 2021Deep reinforcement learning in medical imaging: A literature reviewcited by 34
  7. 2018Automatic View Planning with Multi-scale Deep Reinforcement Learning Agentscited by 20

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.