RepFair-GAN: Mitigating Representation Bias in GANs Using Gradient Clipping
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Fairness has become an essential problem in many domains of Machine Learning (ML), such as classification, natural language processing, and Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs). In this research effort, we study the unfairness of GANs. We formally define a new fairness notion for generative models in terms of the distribution of generated samples sharing the same protected attributes (gender, race, etc.). The defined fairness notion (representational fairness) requires the distribution of the sensitive attributes at the test time to be uniform, and, in particular for GAN model, we show that this fairness notion is violated even when the dataset contains equally represented groups, i.e., the generator favors generating one group of samples over the others at the test time. In this work, we shed light on the source of this representation bias in GANs along with a straightforward method to overcome this problem. We first show on two widely used datasets (MNIST, SVHN) that when the norm of the gradient of one group is more important than the other during the discriminator's training, the generator favours sampling data from one group more than the other at test time. We then show that controlling the groups' gradient norm by performing group-wise gradient norm clipping in the discriminator during the training leads to a more fair data generation in terms of representational fairness compared to existing models while preserving the quality of generated samples.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2022.
Builds on
20 of 31 references.
References · 20
- 2018A Style-Based Generator Architecture for Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 5,986
- 2017Progressive Growing of GANs for Improved Quality, Stability, and Variationcited by 2,967
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,682
- 2014Conditional Generative Adversarial Netscited by 2,152
- 2016Equality of Opportunity in Supervised Learningcited by 2,000
- 2019A Survey on Bias and Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 1,911
- 2018Mitigating Unwanted Biases with Adversarial Learningcited by 663
- 2017Towards Principled Methods for Training Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 460
- 2017Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairnesscited by 402
- 2020Fairness in Machine Learning: A Surveycited by 369
- 2018Learning Adversarially Fair and Transferable Representationscited by 353
- 2015A Critical Review of Recurrent Neural Networks for Sequence Learningcited by 223
8 more
- 2018FairGAN: Fairness-aware Generative Adversarial Networkscited by 164
- 2017MuseGAN: Multi-track Sequential Generative Adversarial Networks for Symbolic Music Generation and Accompanimentcited by 151
- 2019Fair Generative Modeling via Weak Supervisioncited by 114
- 2018BAGAN: Data Augmentation with Balancing GANcited by 90
- 2019Data Augmentation Using GANscited by 58
- 2020Improving the Fairness of Deep Generative Models without Retrainingcited by 46
- 2021On the Fairness of Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs)cited by 14
- 2021Adversarial Stacked Auto-Encoders for Fair Representation Learningcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 4; 2024: 3; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2023ITI-GEN: Inclusive Text-to-Image Generationcited by 64
- 2024OpenBias: Open-set Bias Detection in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 61
- 2023Analyzing Bias in Diffusion-based Face Generation Modelscited by 45
- 2022Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Surveycited by 22
- 2024Fairness and Bias Mitigation in Computer Vision: A Surveycited by 12
- 2023Survey on AI Ethics: A Socio-technical Perspectivecited by 4
- 2024GradBias: Unveiling Word Influence on Bias in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 2
- 2023Fair GANs through model rebalancing for extremely imbalanced class distributionscited by 0
- 2026AGGC: Adaptive Group Gradient Clipping for Stabilizing Large Language Model Trainingcited by 0
- 2026AGGC: Adaptive Group Gradient Clipping for Stabilizing Large Language Model Training17 Jan 2026
- 2024GradBias: Unveiling Word Influence on Bias in Text-to-Image Generative Models29 Aug 2024
- 2024Fairness and Bias Mitigation in Computer Vision: A Survey5 Aug 2024
- 2024OpenBias: Open-set Bias Detection in Text-to-Image Generative Models11 Apr 2024
- 2023Survey on AI Ethics: A Socio-technical Perspective28 Nov 2023
- 2023ITI-GEN: Inclusive Text-to-Image Generation11 Sep 2023
- 2023Fair GANs through model rebalancing for extremely imbalanced class distributions16 Aug 2023
- 2023Analyzing Bias in Diffusion-based Face Generation Models10 May 2023
- 2022Debiasing Methods for Fairer Neural Models in Vision and Language Research: A Survey10 Nov 2022