mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Vision Transformers: From Semantic Segmentation to Dense Prediction

arXiv 2207.09339 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2022cs.CVcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The emergence of vision transformers (ViTs) in image classification has shifted the methodologies for visual representation learning. In particular, ViTs learn visual representation at full receptive field per layer across all the image patches, in comparison to the increasing receptive fields of CNNs across layers and other alternatives (e.g., large kernels and atrous convolution). In this work, for the first time we explore the global context learning potentials of ViTs for dense visual prediction (e.g., semantic segmentation). Our motivation is that through learning global context at full receptive field layer by layer, ViTs may capture stronger long-range dependency information, critical for dense prediction tasks. We first demonstrate that encoding an image as a sequence of patches, a vanilla ViT without local convolution and resolution reduction can yield stronger visual representation for semantic segmentation. For example, our model, termed as SEgmentation TRansformer (SETR), excels on ADE20K (50.28% mIoU, the first position in the test leaderboard on the day of submission) and performs competitively on Cityscapes. However, the basic ViT architecture falls short in broader dense prediction applications, such as object detection and instance segmentation, due to its lack of a pyramidal structure, high computational demand, and insufficient local context. For tackling general dense visual prediction tasks in a cost-effective manner, we further formulate a family of Hierarchical Local-Global (HLG) Transformers, characterized by local attention within windows and global-attention across windows in a pyramidal architecture. Extensive experiments show that our methods achieve appealing performance on a variety of dense prediction tasks (e.g., object detection and instance segmentation and semantic segmentation) as well as image classification.

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 87 of its 104 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2022.

Builds on

87 of 104 references.

References · 87

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
  3. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
  4. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  5. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,604
  6. 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
  7. 2014Very Deep Convolutional Networks for Large-Scale Image Recognitioncited by 15,267
  8. 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
  9. 2017Graph Attention Networkscited by 8,854
  10. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
  11. 2020End-to-End Object Detection with Transformerscited by 7,384
  12. 2017Mask R-CNNcited by 7,259
38 more
  1. 2016Densely Connected Convolutional Networkscited by 6,691
  2. 2017mixup: Beyond Empirical Risk Minimizationcited by 5,155
  3. 2016Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detectioncited by 5,021
  4. 2014Fully Convolutional Networks for Semantic Segmentationcited by 4,845
  5. 2018MobileNetV2: Inverted Residuals and Linear Bottleneckscited by 4,773
  6. 2017Squeeze-and-Excitation Networkscited by 4,763
  7. 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
  8. 2016The Cityscapes Dataset for Semantic Urban Scene Understandingcited by 4,427
  9. 2014Going Deeper with Convolutionscited by 4,231
  10. 2022FlashAttention: Fast and Memory-Efficient Exact Attention with IO-Awarenesscited by 3,611
  11. 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,545
  12. 2016DeepLab: Semantic Image Segmentation with Deep Convolutional Nets, Atrous Convolution, and Fully Connected CRFscited by 3,239
  13. 2018Encoder-Decoder with Atrous Separable Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 3,210
  14. 2019XLNet: Generalized Autoregressive Pretraining for Language Understandingcited by 2,801
  15. 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
  16. 2016Pyramid Scene Parsing Networkcited by 2,472
  17. 2021BEiT: BERT Pre-Training of Image Transformerscited by 2,360
  18. 2016Xception: Deep Learning with Depthwise Separable Convolutionscited by 2,320
  19. 2017Non-local Neural Networkscited by 2,290
  20. 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,154
  21. 2021Pyramid Vision Transformer: A Versatile Backbone for Dense Prediction without Convolutionscited by 1,960
  22. 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,830
  23. 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
  24. 2015SegNet: A Deep Convolutional Encoder-Decoder Architecture for Image Segmentationcited by 1,483
  25. 2020Rethinking Semantic Segmentation from a Sequence-to-Sequence Perspective with Transformerscited by 1,368
  26. 2018Unified Perceptual Parsing for Scene Understandingcited by 1,265
  27. 2021Swin Transformer V2: Scaling Up Capacity and Resolutioncited by 1,215
  28. 2015Multi-Scale Context Aggregation by Dilated Convolutionscited by 1,128
  29. 2016Semantic Understanding of Scenes through the ADE20K Datasetcited by 1,063
  30. 2018Dual Attention Network for Scene Segmentationcited by 1,001
  31. 2021CvT: Introducing Convolutions to Vision Transformerscited by 946
  32. 2021CrossViT: Cross-Attention Multi-Scale Vision Transformer for Image Classificationcited by 806
  33. 2020Quantifying Attention Flow in Transformerscited by 759
  34. 2021PVT v2: Improved Baselines with Pyramid Vision Transformercited by 749
  35. 2018CCNet: Criss-Cross Attention for Semantic Segmentationcited by 717
  36. 2018BiSeNet: Bilateral Segmentation Network for Real-time Semantic Segmentationcited by 645
  37. 2019Panoptic Feature Pyramid Networkscited by 644
  38. 2021Transformer in Transformercited by 632

50 most cited of 87 All 87 (JSON)

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.

6 papers.