Similarity of Pre-trained and Fine-tuned Representations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In transfer learning, only the last part of the networks - the so-called head - is often fine-tuned. Representation similarity analysis shows that the most significant change still occurs in the head even if all weights are updatable. However, recent results from few-shot learning have shown that representation change in the early layers, which are mostly convolutional, is beneficial, especially in the case of cross-domain adaption. In our paper, we find out whether that also holds true for transfer learning. In addition, we analyze the change of representation in transfer learning, both during pre-training and fine-tuning, and find out that pre-trained structure is unlearned if not usable.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2022.
Builds on
9 of 11 references.
References · 9
- 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
- 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
- 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
- 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 365
- 2019Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLcited by 359
- 2020Why Do Better Loss Functions Lead to Less Transferable Features?cited by 73
- 2017Theory of Deep Learning III: explaining the non-overfitting puzzlecited by 32
- 2020Duality Diagram Similarity: a generic framework for initialization selection in task transfer learningcited by 23
- 2021Exploring the Similarity of Representations in Model-Agnostic Meta-Learningcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.