mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Similarity of Pre-trained and Fine-tuned Representations

arXiv 2207.09225 ↗First posted 19 Jul 2022cs.LG cs.AI stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In transfer learning, only the last part of the networks - the so-called head - is often fine-tuned. Representation similarity analysis shows that the most significant change still occurs in the head even if all weights are updatable. However, recent results from few-shot learning have shown that representation change in the early layers, which are mostly convolutional, is beneficial, especially in the case of cross-domain adaption. In our paper, we find out whether that also holds true for transfer learning. In addition, we analyze the change of representation in transfer learning, both during pre-training and fine-tuning, and find out that pre-trained structure is unlearned if not usable.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 11 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 19 Jul 2022.

Builds on

9 of 11 references.

References · 9

  1. 2016Matching Networks for One Shot Learningcited by 2,246
  2. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,695
  3. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Transfer Learningcited by 1,154
  4. 2020What is being transferred in transfer learning?cited by 365
  5. 2019Rapid Learning or Feature Reuse? Towards Understanding the Effectiveness of MAMLcited by 359
  6. 2020Why Do Better Loss Functions Lead to Less Transferable Features?cited by 73
  7. 2017Theory of Deep Learning III: explaining the non-overfitting puzzlecited by 32
  8. 2020Duality Diagram Similarity: a generic framework for initialization selection in task transfer learningcited by 23
  9. 2021Exploring the Similarity of Representations in Model-Agnostic Meta-Learningcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.