mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

STT: Soft Template Tuning for Few-Shot Adaptation

arXiv 2207.08408 ↗First posted 18 Jul 2022cs.CL cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Prompt tuning has been an extremely effective tool to adapt a pre-trained model to downstream tasks. However, standard prompt-based methods mainly consider the case of sufficient data of downstream tasks. It is still unclear whether the advantage can be transferred to the few-shot regime, where only limited data are available for each downstream task. Although some works have demonstrated the potential of prompt-tuning under the few-shot setting, the main stream methods via searching discrete prompts or tuning soft prompts with limited data are still very challenging. Through extensive empirical studies, we find that there is still a gap between prompt tuning and fully fine-tuning for few-shot learning. To bridge the gap, we propose a new prompt-tuning framework, called Soft Template Tuning (STT). STT combines manual and auto prompts, and treats downstream classification tasks as a masked language modeling task. Comprehensive evaluation on different settings suggests STT can close the gap between fine-tuning and prompt-based methods without introducing additional parameters. Significantly, it can even outperform the time- and resource-consuming fine-tuning method on sentiment classification tasks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 26 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jul 2022.

Builds on

26 of 38 references.

References · 26

  1. 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
  2. 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,419
  3. 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
  4. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  5. 2019BART: Denoising Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-training for Natural Language Generation, Translation, and Comprehensioncited by 5,893
  6. 2018GLUE: A Multi-Task Benchmark and Analysis Platform for Natural Language Understandingcited by 4,899
  7. 2019Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learning for NLPcited by 4,236
  8. 2016SQuAD: 100,000+ Questions for Machine Comprehension of Textcited by 4,148
  9. 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
  10. 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
  11. 2015A large annotated corpus for learning natural language inferencecited by 1,847
  12. 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
14 more
  1. 2020Don't Stop Pretraining: Adapt Language Models to Domains and Taskscited by 1,565
  2. 2020Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Few-shot Learnerscited by 1,256
  3. 2020Exploiting Cloze Questions for Few Shot Text Classification and Natural Language Inferencecited by 938
  4. 2021GPT Understands, Toocited by 716
  5. 2021P-Tuning v2: Prompt Tuning Can Be Comparable to Fine-tuning Universally Across Scales and Taskscited by 689
  6. 2020Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models: Weight Initializations, Data Orders, and Early Stoppingcited by 384
  7. 2021Learning How to Ask: Querying LMs with Mixtures of Soft Promptscited by 377
  8. 2020Revisiting Few-sample BERT Fine-tuningcited by 238
  9. 2021PTR: Prompt Tuning with Rules for Text Classificationcited by 238
  10. 2021PPT: Pre-trained Prompt Tuning for Few-shot Learningcited by 232
  11. 2021WARP: Word-level Adversarial ReProgrammingcited by 221
  12. 2018Sentence Encoders on STILTs: Supplementary Training on Intermediate Labeled-data Taskscited by 215
  13. 2021How Many Data Points is a Prompt Worth?cited by 198
  14. 2021Muppet: Massive Multi-task Representations with Pre-Finetuningcited by 192

Built on by

Not cited yet.