mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Attribute Graphs Underlying Molecular Generative Models: Path to Learning with Limited Data

arXiv 2207.07174 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training generative models that capture rich semantics of the data and interpreting the latent representations encoded by such models are very important problems in un-/self-supervised learning. In this work, we provide a simple algorithm that relies on perturbation experiments on latent codes of a pre-trained generative autoencoder to uncover an attribute graph that is implied by the generative model. We perform perturbation experiments to check for influence of a given latent variable on a subset of attributes. Given this, we show that one can fit an effective graphical model that models a structural equation model between latent codes taken as exogenous variables and attributes taken as observed variables. One interesting aspect is that a single latent variable controls multiple overlapping subsets of attributes unlike conventional approaches that try to impose full independence. Using a pre-trained generative autoencoder trained on a large dataset of small molecules, we demonstrate that the graphical model between various molecular attributes and latent codes learned by our algorithm can be used to predict a specific property for molecules which are drawn from a different distribution. We compare prediction models trained on various feature subsets chosen by simple baselines, as well as existing causal discovery and sparse learning/feature selection methods, with the ones in the derived Markov blanket from our method. Results show empirically that the predictor that relies on our Markov blanket attributes is robust to distribution shifts when transferred or fine-tuned with a few samples from the new distribution, especially when training data is limited.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2022.

Builds on

16 of 42 references.

References · 16

  1. 2019Invariant Risk Minimizationcited by 1,854
  2. 2018Challenging Common Assumptions in the Unsupervised Learning of Disentangled Representationscited by 941
  3. 2016Automatic chemical design using a data-driven continuous representation of moleculescited by 765
  4. 2018Disentangling by Factorisingcited by 616
  5. 2018Molecular Sets (MOSES): A Benchmarking Platform for Molecular Generation Modelscited by 275
  6. 2017Toward Controlled Generation of Textcited by 272
  7. 2021Therapeutics Data Commons: Machine Learning Datasets and Tasks for Drug Discovery and Developmentcited by 264
  8. 2017Variational Inference of Disentangled Latent Concepts from Unlabeled Observationscited by 241
  9. 2017CausalGAN: Learning Causal Implicit Generative Models with Adversarial Trainingcited by 152
  10. 2020On Disentangled Representations Learned From Correlated Datacited by 94
  11. 2014Visual Causal Feature Learningcited by 59
  12. 2018Counterfactuals uncover the modular structure of deep generative modelscited by 51
4 more
  1. 2020Optimizing Molecules using Efficient Queries from Property Evaluationscited by 50
  2. 2020Learning Optimal Representations with the Decodable Information Bottleneckcited by 33
  3. 2021Exploring the Latent Space of Autoencoders with Interventional Assayscited by 10
  4. 2021PPFS: Predictive Permutation Feature Selectioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.