mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Work In Progress: Safety and Robustness Verification of Autoencoder-Based Regression Models using the NNV Tool

arXiv 2207.06759 ↗First posted 14 Jul 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

This work in progress paper introduces robustness verification for autoencoder-based regression neural network (NN) models, following state-of-the-art approaches for robustness verification of image classification NNs. Despite the ongoing progress in developing verification methods for safety and robustness in various deep neural networks (DNNs), robustness checking of autoencoder models has not yet been considered. We explore this open space of research and check ways to bridge the gap between existing DNN verification methods by extending existing robustness analysis methods for such autoencoder networks. While classification models using autoencoders work more or less similar to image classification NNs, the functionality of regression models is distinctly different. We introduce two definitions of robustness evaluation metrics for autoencoder-based regression models, specifically the percentage robustness and un-robustness grade. We also modified the existing Imagestar approach, adjusting the variables to take care of the specific input types for regression networks. The approach is implemented as an extension of NNV, then applied and evaluated on a dataset, with a case study experiment shown using the same dataset. As per the authors' understanding, this work in progress paper is the first to show possible reachability analysis of autoencoder-based NNs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 51 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jul 2022.

Builds on

23 of 51 references.

References · 23

  1. 2014Explaining and Harnessing Adversarial Examplescited by 7,287
  2. 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,114
  3. 2015DeepFool: a simple and accurate method to fool deep neural networkscited by 1,315
  4. 2017Reluplex: An Efficient SMT Solver for Verifying Deep Neural Networkscited by 739
  5. 2020Image Segmentation Using Deep Learning: A Surveycited by 659
  6. 2018Efficient Neural Network Robustness Certification with General Activation Functionscited by 439
  7. 2016Safety Verification of Deep Neural Networkscited by 262
  8. 2018Towards Fast Computation of Certified Robustness for ReLU Networkscited by 254
  9. 2017Formal Verification of Piece-Wise Linear Feed-Forward Neural Networkscited by 241
  10. 2018Formal Security Analysis of Neural Networks using Symbolic Intervalscited by 185
  11. 2018Efficient Formal Safety Analysis of Neural Networkscited by 165
  12. 2020NNV: The Neural Network Verification Tool for Deep Neural Networks and Learning-Enabled Cyber-Physical Systemscited by 128
11 more
  1. 2017An approach to reachability analysis for feed-forward ReLU neural networkscited by 126
  2. 2017On the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation Models to Adversarial Attackscited by 126
  3. 2017Output Reachable Set Estimation and Verification for Multi-Layer Neural Networkscited by 79
  4. 2020Verification of Deep Convolutional Neural Networks Using ImageStarscited by 75
  5. 2019Optimization and Abstraction: A Synergistic Approach for Analyzing Neural Network Robustnesscited by 40
  6. 2020Studying Robustness of Semantic Segmentation under Domain Shift in cardiac MRIcited by 28
  7. 2020Improved Noise and Attack Robustness for Semantic Segmentation by Using Multi-Task Training with Self-Supervised Depth Estimationcited by 26
  8. 2017Reachable Set Computation and Safety Verification for Neural Networks with ReLU Activationscited by 22
  9. 2018Automated Evaluation of Semantic Segmentation Robustness for Autonomous Drivingcited by 21
  10. 2018Formal Verification of CNN-based Perception Systemscited by 13
  11. 2018Specification-Guided Safety Verification for Feedforward Neural Networkscited by 4

Built on by

Not cited yet.