Deep Learning Discovery of Demographic Biomarkers in Echocardiography
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Deep learning has been shown to accurately assess 'hidden' phenotypes and predict biomarkers from medical imaging beyond traditional clinician interpretation of medical imaging. Given the black box nature of artificial intelligence (AI) models, caution should be exercised in applying models to healthcare as prediction tasks might be short-cut by differences in demographics across disease and patient populations. Using large echocardiography datasets from two healthcare systems, we test whether it is possible to predict age, race, and sex from cardiac ultrasound images using deep learning algorithms and assess the impact of varying confounding variables. We trained video-based convolutional neural networks to predict age, sex, and race. We found that deep learning models were able to identify age and sex, while unable to reliably predict race. Without considering confounding differences between categories, the AI model predicted sex with an AUC of 0.85 (95% CI 0.84 - 0.86), age with a mean absolute error of 9.12 years (95% CI 9.00 - 9.25), and race with AUCs ranging from 0.63 - 0.71. When predicting race, we show that tuning the proportion of a confounding variable (sex) in the training data significantly impacts model AUC (ranging from 0.57 to 0.84), while in training a sex prediction model, tuning a confounder (race) did not substantially change AUC (0.81 - 0.83). This suggests a significant proportion of the model's performance on predicting race could come from confounding features being detected by AI. Further work remains to identify the particular imaging features that associate with demographic information and to better understand the risks of demographic identification in medical AI as it pertains to potentially perpetuating bias and disparities.
Key facts. Cited by 12 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 8 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jul 2022.
Builds on
8 of 33 references.
References · 8
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2014Microsoft COCO: Common Objects in Contextcited by 17,498
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2021Reading Race: AI Recognises Patient's Racial Identity In Medical Imagescited by 155
- 2020CheXclusion: Fairness gaps in deep chest X-ray classifierscited by 153
- 2017Predicting Cardiovascular Risk Factors from Retinal Fundus Photographs using Deep Learningcited by 63
- 2021High-Throughput Precision Phenotyping of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy with Cardiovascular Deep Learningcited by 35
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 3.
12 papers.
- 2024Exploring scalable medical image encoders beyond text supervisioncited by 129
- 2024Mind the Graph When Balancing Data for Fairness or Robustnesscited by 9
- 2023Are demographically invariant models and representations in medical imaging fair?cited by 6
- 2023Using generative AI to investigate medical imagery models and datasetscited by 5
- 2024Regulating AI Adaptation: An Analysis of AI Medical Device Updatescited by 2
- 2026A data- and compute-efficient chest X-ray foundation model beyond aggressive scalingcited by 2
- 2023AI-based association analysis for medical imaging using latent-space geometric confounder correctioncited by 1
- 2023Visualizing chest X-ray dataset biases using GANscited by 0
- 2023X-ray Recognition: Patient identification from X-rays using a contrastive objectivecited by 0
- 2025RetinaGuard: Obfuscating Retinal Age in Fundus Images for Biometric Privacy Preservingcited by 0
- 2026Beyond Metadata: CAPRA for Hidden Subgroup Analysis under Missing Metadata in Medical Imagingcited by 0
- 2026Is invariance all you need for algorithmic fairness? Removing demographic information can create new biascited by 0
- 2026Is invariance all you need for algorithmic fairness? Removing demographic information can create new bias25 Sep 2026
- 2026Beyond Metadata: CAPRA for Hidden Subgroup Analysis under Missing Metadata in Medical Imaging10 Jul 2026
- 2026A data- and compute-efficient chest X-ray foundation model beyond aggressive scaling26 Feb 2026
- 2025RetinaGuard: Obfuscating Retinal Age in Fundus Images for Biometric Privacy Preserving7 Sep 2025
- 2024Mind the Graph When Balancing Data for Fairness or Robustness25 Jun 2024
- 2024Regulating AI Adaptation: An Analysis of AI Medical Device Updates22 Jun 2024
- 2024Exploring scalable medical image encoders beyond text supervision19 Jan 2024
- 2023AI-based association analysis for medical imaging using latent-space geometric confounder correction3 Oct 2023
- 2023Using generative AI to investigate medical imagery models and datasets1 Jun 2023
- 2023Are demographically invariant models and representations in medical imaging fair?2 May 2023
- 2023X-ray Recognition: Patient identification from X-rays using a contrastive objective29 Apr 2023
- 2023Visualizing chest X-ray dataset biases using GANs29 Apr 2023