mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

A Penalty Approach for Normalizing Feature Distributions to Build Confounder-Free Models

arXiv 2207.04607 ↗First posted 11 Jul 2022cs.LG cs.CVcited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Translating machine learning algorithms into clinical applications requires addressing challenges related to interpretability, such as accounting for the effect of confounding variables (or metadata). Confounding variables affect the relationship between input training data and target outputs. When we train a model on such data, confounding variables will bias the distribution of the learned features. A recent promising solution, MetaData Normalization (MDN), estimates the linear relationship between the metadata and each feature based on a non-trainable closed-form solution. However, this estimation is confined by the sample size of a mini-batch and thereby may cause the approach to be unstable during training. In this paper, we extend the MDN method by applying a Penalty approach (referred to as PDMN). We cast the problem into a bi-level nested optimization problem. We then approximate this optimization problem using a penalty method so that the linear parameters within the MDN layer are trainable and learned on all samples. This enables PMDN to be plugged into any architectures, even those unfit to run batch-level operations, such as transformers and recurrent models. We show improvement in model accuracy and greater independence from confounders using PMDN over MDN in a synthetic experiment and a multi-label, multi-site dataset of magnetic resonance images (MRIs).

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 11 Jul 2022.

Builds on

13 of 29 references.

References · 13

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
  2. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  3. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  4. 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
  5. 2016Layer Normalizationcited by 5,579
  6. 2021TransUNet: Transformers Make Strong Encoders for Medical Image Segmentationcited by 1,552
  7. 2017Learning Spatio-Temporal Features with 3D Residual Networks for Action Recognitioncited by 178
  8. 2021EnD: Entangling and Disentangling deep representations for bias correctioncited by 105
  9. 2016An Overview on Data Representation Learning: From Traditional Feature Learning to Recent Deep Learningcited by 29
  10. 2021Metadata Normalizationcited by 14
  11. 2021Projection-wise Disentangling for Fair and Interpretable Representation Learning: Application to 3D Facial Shape Analysiscited by 5
  12. 2022Combining Counterfactuals With Shapley Values To Explain Image Modelscited by 4
1 more
  1. 2018Bridging the Generalization Gap: Training Robust Models on Confounded Biological Datacited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

8 papers.