mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Stochastic optimal well control in subsurface reservoirs using reinforcement learning

arXiv 2207.03456 ↗First posted 7 Jul 2022cs.LG cs.SY eess.SYcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present a case study of model-free reinforcement learning (RL) framework to solve stochastic optimal control for a predefined parameter uncertainty distribution and partially observable system. We focus on robust optimal well control problem which is a subject of intensive research activities in the field of subsurface reservoir management. For this problem, the system is partially observed since the data is only available at well locations. Furthermore, the model parameters are highly uncertain due to sparsity of available field data. In principle, RL algorithms are capable of learning optimal action policies -- a map from states to actions -- to maximize a numerical reward signal. In deep RL, this mapping from state to action is parameterized using a deep neural network. In the RL formulation of the robust optimal well control problem, the states are represented by saturation and pressure values at well locations while the actions represent the valve openings controlling the flow through wells. The numerical reward refers to the total sweep efficiency and the uncertain model parameter is the subsurface permeability field. The model parameter uncertainties are handled by introducing a domain randomisation scheme that exploits cluster analysis on its uncertainty distribution. We present numerical results using two state-of-the-art RL algorithms, proximal policy optimization (PPO) and advantage actor-critic (A2C), on two subsurface flow test cases representing two distinct uncertainty distributions of permeability field. The results were benchmarked against optimisation results obtained using differential evolution algorithm. Furthermore, we demonstrate the robustness of the proposed use of RL by evaluating the learned control policy on unseen samples drawn from the parameter uncertainty distribution that were not used during the training process.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2022.

Builds on

6 of 23 references.

References · 6

  1. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 14,441
  2. 2016Asynchronous Methods for Deep Reinforcement Learningcited by 2,218
  3. 2015High-Dimensional Continuous Control Using Generalized Advantage Estimationcited by 1,916
  4. 2021Robot Learning from Randomized Simulations: A Reviewcited by 56
  5. 2019SciPy 1.0--Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Pythoncited by 49
  6. 2018Model-Free Adaptive Optimal Control of Episodic Fixed-Horizon Manufacturing Processes using Reinforcement Learningcited by 5

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 7 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

4 papers.