Neural Stein critics with staged L2-regularization
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Learning to differentiate model distributions from observed data is a fundamental problem in statistics and machine learning, and high-dimensional data remains a challenging setting for such problems. Metrics that quantify the disparity in probability distributions, such as the Stein discrepancy, play an important role in high-dimensional statistical testing. In this paper, we investigate the role of L2 regularization in training a neural network Stein critic so as to distinguish between data sampled from an unknown probability distribution and a nominal model distribution. Making a connection to the Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) theory, we develop a novel staging procedure for the weight of regularization over training time, which leverages the advantages of highly-regularized training at early times. Theoretically, we prove the approximation of the training dynamic by the kernel optimization, namely the ``lazy training'', when the L2 regularization weight is large, and training on n samples converge at a rate of O(n-1/2) up to a log factor. The result guarantees learning the optimal critic assuming sufficient alignment with the leading eigen-modes of the zero-time NTK. The benefit of the staged L2 regularization is demonstrated on simulated high dimensional data and an application to evaluating generative models of image data.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2022.
Builds on
25 of 50 references.
References · 25
- 2019Generative Modeling by Estimating Gradients of the Data Distributioncited by 4,101
- 2018Neural Tangent Kernel: Convergence and Generalization in Neural Networkscited by 2,621
- 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
- 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
- 2014NICE: Non-linear Independent Components Estimationcited by 1,058
- 2018On Lazy Training in Differentiable Programmingcited by 675
- 2018Gradient Descent Provably Optimizes Over-parameterized Neural Networkscited by 659
- 2019On Exact Computation with an Infinitely Wide Neural Netcited by 573
- 2016Stein Variational Gradient Descent: A General Purpose Bayesian Inference Algorithmcited by 507
- 2016f-GAN: Training Generative Neural Samplers using Variational Divergence Minimizationcited by 506
- 2019Your Classifier is Secretly an Energy Based Model and You Should Treat it Like Onecited by 405
- 2015An Introduction to Matrix Concentration Inequalitiescited by 397
13 more
- 2016A Kernelized Stein Discrepancy for Goodness-of-fit Tests and Model Evaluationcited by 236
- 2017Generalization and Equilibrium in Generative Adversarial Nets (GANs)cited by 166
- 2016A Kernel Test of Goodness of Fitcited by 143
- 2020Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Two-Sample Testscited by 130
- 2017Measuring Sample Quality with Kernelscited by 119
- 2015Measuring Sample Quality with Stein's Methodcited by 94
- 2019Minimum Stein Discrepancy Estimatorscited by 57
- 2017On the Discrimination-Generalization Tradeoff in GANscited by 48
- 2017A Linear-Time Kernel Goodness-of-Fit Testcited by 41
- 2021Stein's Method Meets Computational Statistics: A Review of Some Recent Developmentscited by 32
- 2021Neural Estimation of Statistical Divergencescited by 25
- 2018Stein Neural Samplercited by 19
- 2021Neural Tangent Kernel Maximum Mean Discrepancycited by 15
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
2 papers.