On the instrumental variable estimation with many weak and invalid instruments
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We discuss the fundamental issue of identification in linear instrumental variable (IV) models with unknown IV validity. With the assumption of the "sparsest rule", which is equivalent to the plurality rule but becomes operational in computation algorithms, we investigate and prove the advantages of non-convex penalized approaches over other IV estimators based on two-step selections, in terms of selection consistency and accommodation for individually weak IVs. Furthermore, we propose a surrogate sparsest penalty that aligns with the identification condition and provides oracle sparse structure simultaneously. Desirable theoretical properties are derived for the proposed estimator with weaker IV strength conditions compared to the previous literature. Finite sample properties are demonstrated using simulations and the selection and estimation method is applied to an empirical study concerning the effect of BMI on diastolic blood pressure.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 7 Jul 2022.
Builds on
6 of 49 references.
References · 6
- 2013Regularized M-estimators with nonconvexity: Statistical and algorithmic theory for local optimacited by 66
- 2015De-biasing the Lasso: Optimal Sample Size for Gaussian Designscited by 35
- 2014Support recovery without incoherence: A case for nonconvex regularizationcited by 25
- 2014Instrumental Variables Estimation with Some Invalid Instruments and its Application to Mendelian Randomizationcited by 22
- 2013Regularization Methods for High-Dimensional Instrumental Variables Regression With an Application to Genetical Genomicscited by 9
- 2017The GENIUS Approach to Robust Mendelian Randomization Inferencecited by 5
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.
2 papers.