Physically-Feasible Repair of Reactive, Linear Temporal Logic-based, High-Level Tasks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A typical approach to creating complex robot behaviors is to compose atomic controllers, or skills, such that the resulting behavior satisfies a high-level task; however, when a task cannot be accomplished with a given set of skills, it is difficult to know how to modify the skills to make the task possible. We present a method for combining symbolic repair with physical feasibility-checking and implementation to automatically modify existing skills such that the robot can execute a previously infeasible task. We encode robot skills in Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) formulas that capture both safety constraints and goals for reactive tasks. Furthermore, our encoding captures the full skill execution, as opposed to prior work where only the state of the world before and after the skill is executed are considered. Our repair algorithm suggests symbolic modifications, then attempts to physically implement the suggestions by modifying the original skills subject to LTL constraints derived from the symbolic repair. If skills are not physically possible, we automatically provide additional constraints for the symbolic repair. We demonstrate our approach with a Baxter and a Clearpath Jackal.
Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 6 Jul 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 3; 2025: 2.
6 papers.
- 2023Plug in the Safety Chip: Enforcing Constraints for LLM-driven Robot Agentscited by 69
- 2024SPINE: Online Semantic Planning for Missions with Incomplete Natural Language Specifications in Unstructured Environmentscited by 18
- 2024Traffic-Rule-Compliant Trajectory Repair via Satisfiability Modulo Theories and Reachability Analysiscited by 3
- 2024Learning to Bridge the Gap: Efficient Novelty Recovery with Planning and Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
- 2025INPROVF: Leveraging Large Language Models to Repair High-level Robot Controllers from Assumption Violationscited by 0
- 2025Follow the STARs: Dynamic ω-Regular Shielding of Learned Policiescited by 0
- 2025Follow the STARs: Dynamic ω-Regular Shielding of Learned Policies11 Apr 2025
- 2025INPROVF: Leveraging Large Language Models to Repair High-level Robot Controllers from Assumption Violations17 Mar 2025
- 2024Traffic-Rule-Compliant Trajectory Repair via Satisfiability Modulo Theories and Reachability Analysis20 Dec 2024
- 2024SPINE: Online Semantic Planning for Missions with Incomplete Natural Language Specifications in Unstructured Environments3 Oct 2024
- 2024Learning to Bridge the Gap: Efficient Novelty Recovery with Planning and Reinforcement Learning28 Sep 2024
- 2023Plug in the Safety Chip: Enforcing Constraints for LLM-driven Robot Agents18 Sep 2023