Generalization to translation shifts: a study in architectures and augmentations
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study how effective data augmentation is at capturing the inductive bias of carefully designed network architectures for spatial translation invariance. We evaluate various image classification architectures (antialiased, convolutional, vision transformer, and fully connected MLP networks) and data augmentation techniques towards generalization to large translation shifts. We observe that: (a) without data augmentation, all architectures, including convolutional networks with antialiased modification suffer some degradation in performance when evaluated on translated test distributions. Understandably, both the in-distribution accuracy and degradation to shifts is significantly worse for non-convolutional models. (b) The robustness of performance is improved by even a minimal augmentation of 4 pixel random crop across all architectures. In some instances, even 1-2 pixel random crop is sufficient. This suggests that there is a form of meta generalization from augmentation. For non-convolutional architectures, while the absolute accuracy is still low with this basic augmentation, we see substantial improvements in robustness to translation shifts. (c) With a sufficiently advanced augmentation pipeline (4 pixel crop+RandAugmentation+Erasing+MixUp), all architectures can be trained to have competitive performance in terms of in-distribution accuracy as well as generalization to large translation shifts.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 35 of its 49 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Jul 2022.
Builds on
35 of 49 references.
References · 35
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2019Benchmarking Neural Network Robustness to Common Corruptions and Perturbationscited by 2,857
- 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
- 2018Group Normalizationcited by 1,514
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,507
- 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
- 2020WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution Shiftscited by 1,366
- 2017Random Erasing Data Augmentationcited by 1,235
23 more
- 2020Designing Network Design Spacescited by 954
- 2019Big Transfer (BiT): General Visual Representation Learningcited by 766
- 2021Going deeper with Image Transformerscited by 759
- 2021How to train your ViT? Data, Augmentation, and Regularization in Vision Transformerscited by 562
- 2019Making Convolutional Networks Shift-Invariant Againcited by 390
- 2021ResMLP: Feedforward networks for image classification with data-efficient trainingcited by 338
- 2021When Vision Transformers Outperform ResNets without Pre-training or Strong Data Augmentationscited by 259
- 2021Understanding Robustness of Transformers for Image Classificationcited by 250
- 2021Vision Transformers are Robust Learnerscited by 208
- 2018Why do deep convolutional networks generalize so poorly to small image transformations?cited by 198
- 2018Spatially Transformed Adversarial Examplescited by 195
- 2021Are Transformers More Robust Than CNNs?cited by 187
- 2021On the Robustness of Vision Transformers to Adversarial Examplescited by 167
- 2020On Translation Invariance in CNNs: Convolutional Layers can Exploit Absolute Spatial Locationcited by 141
- 2020On Robustness and Transferability of Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 98
- 2018Data Augmentation by Pairing Samples for Images Classificationcited by 96
- 2020Truly shift-invariant convolutional neural networkscited by 53
- 2017Geometric robustness of deep networks: analysis and improvementcited by 45
- 2019Micro-Batch Training with Batch-Channel Normalization and Weight Standardizationcited by 45
- 2021Rethinking "Batch" in BatchNormcited by 44
- 2020Mind the Pad -- CNNs can Develop Blind Spotscited by 41
- 2015Manitest: Are classifiers really invariant?cited by 27
- 2021SI-Score: An image dataset for fine-grained analysis of robustness to object location, rotation and sizecited by 7
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
3 papers.