Domain-Independent Deception: Definition, Taxonomy and the Linguistic Cues Debate
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Internet-based economies and societies are drowning in deceptive attacks. These attacks take many forms, such as fake news, phishing, and job scams, which we call "domains of deception." Machine-learning and natural-language-processing researchers have been attempting to ameliorate this precarious situation by designing domain-specific detectors. Only a few recent works have considered domain-independent deception. We collect these disparate threads of research and investigate domain-independent deception along four dimensions. First, we provide a new computational definition of deception and formalize it using probability theory. Second, we break down deception into a new taxonomy. Third, we analyze the debate on linguistic cues for deception and supply guidelines for systematic reviews. Fourth, we provide some evidence and some suggestions for domain-independent deception detection.
Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 4 Jul 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.
2 papers.