PrUE: Distilling Knowledge from Sparse Teacher Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Although deep neural networks have enjoyed remarkable success across a wide variety of tasks, their ever-increasing size also imposes significant overhead on deployment. To compress these models, knowledge distillation was proposed to transfer knowledge from a cumbersome (teacher) network into a lightweight (student) network. However, guidance from a teacher does not always improve the generalization of students, especially when the size gap between student and teacher is large. Previous works argued that it was due to the high certainty of the teacher, resulting in harder labels that were difficult to fit. To soften these labels, we present a pruning method termed Prediction Uncertainty Enlargement (PrUE) to simplify the teacher. Specifically, our method aims to decrease the teacher's certainty about data, thereby generating soft predictions for students. We empirically investigate the effectiveness of the proposed method with experiments on CIFAR-10/100, Tiny-ImageNet, and ImageNet. Results indicate that student networks trained with sparse teachers achieve better performance. Besides, our method allows researchers to distill knowledge from deeper networks to improve students further. Our code is made public at: urlhttps://github.com/wangshaopu/prue.
Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 31 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Jul 2022.
Builds on
31 of 39 references.
References · 31
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 51,809
- 2020Language Models are Few-Shot Learnerscited by 32,199
- 2015Distilling the Knowledge in a Neural Networkcited by 10,076
- 2015Batch Normalization: Accelerating Deep Network Training by Reducing Internal Covariate Shiftcited by 6,979
- 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,415
- 2015Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Visioncited by 5,451
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,057
- 2016Aggregated Residual Transformations for Deep Neural Networkscited by 2,540
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,250
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 1,998
- 2019Searching for MobileNetV3cited by 1,984
- 2017Understanding Black-box Predictions via Influence Functionscited by 1,714
19 more
- 2014FitNets: Hints for Thin Deep Netscited by 1,619
- 2018ShuffleNet V2: Practical Guidelines for Efficient CNN Architecture Designcited by 1,132
- 2016Paying More Attention to Attention: Improving the Performance of Convolutional Neural Networks via Attention Transfercited by 1,059
- 2019When Does Label Smoothing Help?cited by 985
- 2018SNIP: Single-shot Network Pruning based on Connection Sensitivitycited by 802
- 2017Deep Mutual Learningcited by 621
- 2019Improved Knowledge Distillation via Teacher Assistantcited by 567
- 2021Data-Free Knowledge Distillation for Heterogeneous Federated Learningcited by 380
- 2013Predicting Parameters in Deep Learningcited by 223
- 2018Learning Deep Representations with Probabilistic Knowledge Transfercited by 209
- 2020Does label smoothing mitigate label noise?cited by 204
- 2014Compressing Deep Convolutional Networks using Vector Quantizationcited by 189
- 2021Does Knowledge Distillation Really Work?cited by 187
- 2020Pruning Neural Networks at Initialization: Why are We Missing the Mark?cited by 181
- 2018Large scale distributed neural network training through online distillationcited by 144
- 2021Is Label Smoothing Truly Incompatible with Knowledge Distillation: An Empirical Studycited by 50
- 2019Revisiting Knowledge Distillation via Label Smoothing Regularizationcited by 29
- 2021Lottery Ticket Preserves Weight Correlation: Is It Desirable or Not?cited by 22
- 2021Deep Neural Compression Via Concurrent Pruning and Self-Distillationcited by 3
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.
1 paper.