Studying the impact of magnitude pruning on contrastive learning methods
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
We study the impact of different pruning techniques on the representation learned by deep neural networks trained with contrastive loss functions. Our work finds that at high sparsity levels, contrastive learning results in a higher number of misclassified examples relative to models trained with traditional cross-entropy loss. To understand this pronounced difference, we use metrics such as the number of PIEs (Hooker et al., 2019), Q-Score (Kalibhat et al., 2022), and PD-Score (Baldock et al., 2021) to measure the impact of pruning on the learned representation quality. Our analysis suggests the schedule of the pruning method implementation matters. We find that the negative impact of sparsity on the quality of the learned representation is the highest when pruning is introduced early on in the training phase.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Jul 2022.
Builds on
12 of 19 references.
References · 12
- 2020A Simple Framework for Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 12,049
- 2016Wide Residual Networkscited by 3,070
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
- 2020Supervised Contrastive Learningcited by 2,829
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2015Learning both Weights and Connections for Efficient Neural Networkscited by 2,031
- 2017To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compressioncited by 603
- 2019What Do Compressed Deep Neural Networks Forget?cited by 171
- 2021Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficultycited by 141
- 2022Understanding the effect of sparsity on neural networks robustnesscited by 8
- 2019Class-dependent Compression of Deep Neural Networkscited by 7
- 2020Streamlining Tensor and Network Pruning in PyTorchcited by 4
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 1; 2025: 0; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2023A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendationscited by 202
- 2023Relating tSNE and UMAP to Classical Dimensionality Reductioncited by 3
- 20243D Point Cloud Network Pruning: When Some Weights Do not Mattercited by 3
- 2023REDS: Resource-Efficient Deep Subnetworks for Dynamic Resource Constraintscited by 2
- 2023Unveiling Invariances via Neural Network Pruningcited by 0
- 2026On the Interaction Between Model Compression and Test-Time Adaptationcited by 0
- 2026BaCP: Backbone Contrastive Pruning for Preserving Representations in Extremely Sparse Neural Networkscited by 0
- 2026BaCP: Backbone Contrastive Pruning for Preserving Representations in Extremely Sparse Neural Networks1 Oct 2026
- 2026On the Interaction Between Model Compression and Test-Time Adaptation3 Sep 2026
- 20243D Point Cloud Network Pruning: When Some Weights Do not Matter26 Aug 2024
- 2023REDS: Resource-Efficient Deep Subnetworks for Dynamic Resource Constraints22 Nov 2023
- 2023Unveiling Invariances via Neural Network Pruning15 Sep 2023
- 2023A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendations13 Aug 2023
- 2023Relating tSNE and UMAP to Classical Dimensionality Reduction20 Jun 2023