mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Causality for Inherently Explainable Transformers: CAT-XPLAIN

arXiv 2206.14841 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2022cs.CV cs.AI cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

There have been several post-hoc explanation approaches developed to explain pre-trained black-box neural networks. However, there is still a gap in research efforts toward designing neural networks that are inherently explainable. In this paper, we utilize a recently proposed instance-wise post-hoc causal explanation method to make an existing transformer architecture inherently explainable. Once trained, our model provides an explanation in the form of top-k regions in the input space of the given instance contributing to its decision. We evaluate our method on binary classification tasks using three image datasets: MNIST, FMNIST, and CIFAR. Our results demonstrate that compared to the causality-based post-hoc explainer model, our inherently explainable model achieves better explainability results while eliminating the need of training a separate explainer model. Our code is available at https://github.com/mvrl/CAT-XPLAIN.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2022.

Builds on

6 of 9 references.

References · 6

  1. 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
  2. 2016Grad-CAM: Visual Explanations from Deep Networks via Gradient-based Localizationcited by 6,690
  3. 2013Visualizing and Understanding Convolutional Networkscited by 2,278
  4. 2020Explaining by Removing: A Unified Framework for Model Explanationcited by 218
  5. 2019CXPlain: Causal Explanations for Model Interpretation under Uncertaintycited by 98
  6. 2021Instance-wise Causal Feature Selection for Model Interpretationcited by 8

Built on by

Not cited yet.