mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Hardness and Algorithms for Robust and Sparse Optimization

arXiv 2206.14354 ↗First posted 29 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.DScited by 8

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We explore algorithms and limitations for sparse optimization problems such as sparse linear regression and robust linear regression. The goal of the sparse linear regression problem is to identify a small number of key features, while the goal of the robust linear regression problem is to identify a small number of erroneous measurements. Specifically, the sparse linear regression problem seeks a k-sparse vector x∈ℝd to minimize |Ax-b|2, given an input matrix A∈ℝn× d and a target vector b∈ℝn, while the robust linear regression problem seeks a set S that ignores at most k rows and a vector x to minimize |(Ax-b)S|2. We first show bicriteria, NP-hardness of approximation for robust regression building on the work of [OWZ15] which implies a similar result for sparse regression. We further show fine-grained hardness of robust regression through a reduction from the minimum-weight k-clique conjecture. On the positive side, we give an algorithm for robust regression that achieves arbitrarily accurate additive error and uses runtime that closely matches the lower bound from the fine-grained hardness result, as well as an algorithm for sparse regression with similar runtime. Both our upper and lower bounds rely on a general reduction from robust linear regression to sparse regression that we introduce. Our algorithms, inspired by the 3SUM problem, use approximate nearest neighbor data structures and may be of independent interest for solving sparse optimization problems. For instance, we demonstrate that our techniques can also be used for the well-studied sparse PCA problem.

Key facts. Cited by 8 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 66 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Jun 2022.

Builds on

22 of 66 references.

References · 22

  1. 2018Efficient Algorithms and Lower Bounds for Robust Linear Regressioncited by 76
  2. 2018Efficient Algorithms for Outlier-Robust Regressioncited by 72
  3. 2013Regularized M-estimators with nonconvexity: Statistical and algorithmic theory for local optimacited by 66
  4. 2015Optimal Data-Dependent Hashing for Approximate Near Neighborscited by 44
  5. 2019List-Decodable Linear Regressioncited by 42
  6. 2020Robust Linear Regression: Optimal Rates in Polynomial Timecited by 42
  7. 2015Robust Regression via Hard Thresholdingcited by 39
  8. 2020Optimal Robust Linear Regression in Nearly Linear Timecited by 32
  9. 2019Adaptive Hard Thresholding for Near-optimal Consistent Robust Regressioncited by 23
  10. 2020Robust estimation via generalized quasi-gradientscited by 19
  11. 2020Sparse PCA: Algorithms, Adversarial Perturbations and Certificatescited by 18
  12. 2022New Coresets for Projective Clustering and Applicationscited by 16
10 more
  1. 2021Robust Regression Revisited: Acceleration and Improved Estimation Ratescited by 15
  2. 2019Dimensionality Reduction for Tukey Regressioncited by 12
  3. 2021The Fine-Grained Hardness of Sparse Linear Regressioncited by 12
  4. 2013Scaling Law for Recovering the Sparsest Element in a Subspacecited by 8
  5. 2015NP-Hardness and Inapproximability of Sparse PCAcited by 8
  6. 2016Approximate Sparse Linear Regressioncited by 8
  7. 2015Sparse PCA via Bipartite Matchingscited by 6
  8. 2020Approximation Algorithms for Sparse Principal Component Analysiscited by 3
  9. 2016Compressed Sensing for Finite-Valued Signalscited by 2
  10. 2018Non-convex Lasso-kind approach to compressed sensing for finite-valued signalscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2; 2024: 2; 2025: 2.

8 papers.