mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Parallel Instance Filtering for Malware Detection

arXiv 2206.13889 ↗First posted 28 Jun 2022cs.CR cs.LGcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine learning algorithms are widely used in the area of malware detection. With the growth of sample amounts, training of classification algorithms becomes more and more expensive. In addition, training data sets may contain redundant or noisy instances. The problem to be solved is how to select representative instances from large training data sets without reducing the accuracy. This work presents a new parallel instance selection algorithm called Parallel Instance Filtering (PIF). The main idea of the algorithm is to split the data set into non-overlapping subsets of instances covering the whole data set and apply a filtering process for each subset. Each subset consists of instances that have the same nearest enemy. As a result, the PIF algorithm is fast since subsets are processed independently of each other using parallel computation. We compare the PIF algorithm with several state-of-the-art instance selection algorithms on a large data set of 500,000 malicious and benign samples. The feature set was extracted using static analysis, and it includes metadata from the portable executable file format. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed instance selection algorithm reduces the size of a training data set significantly with the only slightly decreased accuracy. The PIF algorithm outperforms existing instance selection methods used in the experiments in terms of the ratio between average classification accuracy and storage percentage.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Jun 2022.

Builds on

4 of 31 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020A Survey of Machine Learning Methods and Challenges for Windows Malware Classificationcited by 33
  2. 2017Survey of Machine Learning Techniques for Malware Analysiscited by 31
  3. 2022A Comparison of Static, Dynamic, and Hybrid Analysis for Malware Detectioncited by 16
  4. 2018Malware Dynamic Analysis Evasion Techniques: A Surveycited by 6

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1.

1 paper.