mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Measures of independence and functional dependence

arXiv 2206.13663 ↗First posted 27 Jun 2022math.ST stat.ME stat.THcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We follow up on Shi et al's (2020) and Cao's and my (2020) work on the local power of a new test for independence, Chatterjee (2019), and its relation to the local power properties of classical tests. We show quite generally that for testing independence with local alternatives either Chatterjee's rank test has no power, or it may be misleading: The Blum, Kiefer, Rosenblatt, and other omnibus classical rank tests do have some local power in any direction other than those where significant results may be misleading. We also suggest methods of selective inference in independence testing. Chatterjee's statistics like Renyi's (1959) also identified functional dependence. We exhibit statistics which have better power properties than Chatterjee's but also identify functional dependence.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2022.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 0; 2025: 0; 2026: 1.

2 papers.