Regularization of Inverse Problems: Deep Equilibrium Models versus Bilevel Learning
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Variational regularization methods are commonly used to approximate solutions of inverse problems. In recent years, model-based variational regularization methods have often been replaced with data-driven ones such as the fields-of-expert model (Roth and Black, 2009). Training the parameters of such data-driven methods can be formulated as a bilevel optimization problem. In this paper, we compare the framework of bilevel learning for the training of data-driven variational regularization models with the novel framework of deep equilibrium models (Bai, Kolter, and Koltun, 2019) that has recently been introduced in the context of inverse problems (Gilton, Ongie, and Willett, 2021). We show that computing the lower-level optimization problem within the bilevel formulation with a fixed point iteration is a special case of the deep equilibrium framework. We compare both approaches computationally, with a variety of numerical examples for the inverse problems of denoising, inpainting and deconvolution.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 2; 2023: 2.
4 papers.
- 2022Convergent Data-driven Regularizations for CT Reconstructioncited by 5
- 2022Deep equilibrium models as estimators for continuous latent variablescited by 4
- 2023Convergence analysis of equilibrium methods for inverse problemscited by 2
- 2023Meta-Prior: Meta learning for Adaptive Inverse Problem Solverscited by 0
- 2023Meta-Prior: Meta learning for Adaptive Inverse Problem Solvers30 Nov 2023
- 2023Convergence analysis of equilibrium methods for inverse problems2 Jun 2023
- 2022Convergent Data-driven Regularizations for CT Reconstruction14 Dec 2022
- 2022Deep equilibrium models as estimators for continuous latent variables11 Nov 2022