Evaluating resampling methods on a real-life highly imbalanced online credit card payments dataset
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Various problems of any credit card fraud detection based on machine learning come from the imbalanced aspect of transaction datasets. Indeed, the number of frauds compared to the number of regular transactions is tiny and has been shown to damage learning performances, e.g., at worst, the algorithm can learn to classify all the transactions as regular. Resampling methods and cost-sensitive approaches are known to be good candidates to leverage this issue of imbalanced datasets. This paper evaluates numerous state-of-the-art resampling methods on a large real-life online credit card payments dataset. We show they are inefficient because methods are intractable or because metrics do not exhibit substantial improvements. Our work contributes to this domain in (1) that we compare many state-of-the-art resampling methods on a large-scale dataset and in (2) that we use a real-life online credit card payments dataset.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Jun 2022.
Builds on
6 of 30 references.
References · 6
- 2019Optuna: A Next-generation Hyperparameter Optimization Frameworkcited by 2,455
- 2018CatBoost: gradient boosting with categorical features supportcited by 208
- 2016Imbalanced-learn: A Python Toolbox to Tackle the Curse of Imbalanced Datasets in Machine Learningcited by 193
- 2017Oversampling for Imbalanced Learning Based on K-Means and SMOTEcited by 38
- 2020Credit card fraud detection using machine learning: A surveycited by 6
- 2021Evaluating categorical encoding methods on a real credit card fraud detection databasecited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.