mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Asymptotic-Preserving Neural Networks for multiscale hyperbolic models of epidemic spread

arXiv 2206.12625 ↗First posted 25 Jun 2022math.NA cs.LG cs.NAcited by 10

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

When investigating epidemic dynamics through differential models, the parameters needed to understand the phenomenon and to simulate forecast scenarios require a delicate calibration phase, often made even more challenging by the scarcity and uncertainty of the observed data reported by official sources. In this context, Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs), by embedding the knowledge of the differential model that governs the physical phenomenon in the learning process, can effectively address the inverse and forward problem of data-driven learning and solving the corresponding epidemic problem. In many circumstances, however, the spatial propagation of an infectious disease is characterized by movements of individuals at different scales governed by multiscale PDEs. This reflects the heterogeneity of a region or territory in relation to the dynamics within cities and in neighboring zones. In presence of multiple scales, a direct application of PINNs generally leads to poor results due to the multiscale nature of the differential model in the loss function of the neural network. To allow the neural network to operate uniformly with respect to the small scales, it is desirable that the neural network satisfies an Asymptotic-Preservation (AP) property in the learning process. To this end, we consider a new class of AP Neural Networks (APNNs) for multiscale hyperbolic transport models of epidemic spread that, thanks to an appropriate AP formulation of the loss function, is capable to work uniformly at the different scales of the system. A series of numerical tests for different epidemic scenarios confirms the validity of the proposed approach, highlighting the importance of the AP property in the neural network when dealing with multiscale problems especially in presence of sparse and partially observed systems.

Key facts. Cited by 10 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 25 Jun 2022.

Builds on

9 of 48 references.

References · 9

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2020Implicit Neural Representations with Periodic Activation Functionscited by 2,238
  3. 2015Automatic differentiation in machine learning: a surveycited by 855
  4. 2021Gradient-enhanced physics-informed neural networks for forward and inverse PDE problemscited by 222
  5. 2020Towards a Mathematical Understanding of Neural Network-Based Machine Learning: what we know and what we don'tcited by 95
  6. 2019Learning in Modal Space: Solving Time-Dependent Stochastic PDEs Using Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 64
  7. 2022Physics-Informed Neural Networks with Adaptive Localized Artificial Viscositycited by 22
  8. 2020A SIDARTHE Model of COVID-19 Epidemic in Italycited by 20
  9. 2021Kinetic modelling of epidemic dynamics: social contacts, control with uncertain data, and multiscale spatial dynamicscited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 3; 2026: 3.

10 papers.