mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Quantifying Inherent Randomness in Machine Learning Algorithms

arXiv 2206.12353 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2022stat.ML cs.LGcited by 6

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Most machine learning (ML) algorithms have several stochastic elements, and their performances are affected by these sources of randomness. This paper uses an empirical study to systematically examine the effects of two sources: randomness in model training and randomness in the partitioning of a dataset into training and test subsets. We quantify and compare the magnitude of the variation in predictive performance for the following ML algorithms: Random Forests (RFs), Gradient Boosting Machines (GBMs), and Feedforward Neural Networks (FFNNs). Among the different algorithms, randomness in model training causes larger variation for FFNNs compared to tree-based methods. This is to be expected as FFNNs have more stochastic elements that are part of their model initialization and training. We also found that random splitting of datasets leads to higher variation compared to the inherent randomness from model training. The variation from data splitting can be a major issue if the original dataset has considerable heterogeneity. Keywords: Model Training, Reproducibility, Variation

Key facts. Cited by 6 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2022.

Builds on

7 of 12 references.

References · 7

  1. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,166
  2. 2015Delving Deep into Rectifiers: Surpassing Human-Level Performance on ImageNet Classificationcited by 3,611
  3. 2020On Hyperparameter Optimization of Machine Learning Algorithms: Theory and Practicecited by 182
  4. 2019On Model Stability as a Function of Random Seedcited by 31
  5. 2021On the Reproducibility of Neural Network Predictionscited by 29
  6. 2020Supervised Machine Learning Techniques: An Overview with Applications to Bankingcited by 7
  7. 2022Performance and Interpretability Comparisons of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms: An Empirical Studycited by 4

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 0; 2024: 3; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.

6 papers.