mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Dissecting U-net for Seismic Application: An In-Depth Study on Deep Learning Multiple Removal

arXiv 2206.12112 ↗First posted 24 Jun 2022eess.IV cs.CVcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Seismic processing often requires suppressing multiples that appear when collecting data. To tackle these artifacts, practitioners usually rely on Radon transform-based algorithms as post-migration gather conditioning. However, such traditional approaches are both time-consuming and parameter-dependent, making them fairly complex. In this work, we present a deep learning-based alternative that provides competitive results, while reducing its usage's complexity, and hence democratizing its applicability. We observe an excellent performance of our network when inferring complex field data, despite the fact of being solely trained on synthetics. Furthermore, extensive experiments show that our proposal can preserve the inherent characteristics of the data, avoiding undesired over-smoothed results, while removing the multiples. Finally, we conduct an in-depth analysis of the model, where we pinpoint the effects of the main hyperparameters with physical events. To the best of our knowledge, this study pioneers the unboxing of neural networks for the demultiple process, helping the user to gain insights into the inside running of the network.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 24 Jun 2022.

Builds on

7 of 28 references.

References · 7

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2015U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentationcited by 19,713
  3. 2015Train faster, generalize better: Stability of stochastic gradient descentcited by 552
  4. 2020Watch your Up-Convolution: CNN Based Generative Deep Neural Networks are Failing to Reproduce Spectral Distributionscited by 280
  5. 2017The Marginal Value of Adaptive Gradient Methods in Machine Learningcited by 250
  6. 2019On Empirical Comparisons of Optimizers for Deep Learningcited by 103
  7. 2022An Empirical Investigation of Model-to-Model Distribution Shifts in Trained Convolutional Filterscited by 1

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1.

1 paper.