Efficient and Accurate Top-K Recovery from Choice Data
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
The intersection of learning to rank and choice modeling is an active area of research with applications in e-commerce, information retrieval and the social sciences. In some applications such as recommendation systems, the statistician is primarily interested in recovering the set of the top ranked items from a large pool of items as efficiently as possible using passively collected discrete choice data, i.e., the user picks one item from a set of multiple items. Motivated by this practical consideration, we propose the choice-based Borda count algorithm as a fast and accurate ranking algorithm for top K-recovery i.e., correctly identifying all of the top K items. We show that the choice-based Borda count algorithm has optimal sample complexity for top-K recovery under a broad class of random utility models. We prove that in the limit, the choice-based Borda count algorithm produces the same top-K estimate as the commonly used Maximum Likelihood Estimate method but the former's speed and simplicity brings considerable advantages in practice. Experiments on both synthetic and real datasets show that the counting algorithm is competitive with commonly used ranking algorithms in terms of accuracy while being several orders of magnitude faster.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Jun 2022.
Builds on
6 of 34 references.
References · 6
- 2015Simple, Robust and Optimal Ranking from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 68
- 2017Spectral Method and Regularized MLE Are Both Optimal for Top-K Rankingcited by 46
- 2015Spectral MLE: Top-K Rank Aggregation from Pairwise Comparisonscited by 34
- 2016Learning Mixtures of Plackett-Luce Modelscited by 19
- 2019Learning Mixtures of Plackett-Luce Models from Structured Partial Orderscited by 9
- 2022On Top-k Selection from m-wise Partial Rankings via Borda Countingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.