Sharing pattern submodels for prediction with missing values
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Missing values are unavoidable in many applications of machine learning and present challenges both during training and at test time. When variables are missing in recurring patterns, fitting separate pattern submodels have been proposed as a solution. However, fitting models independently does not make efficient use of all available data. Conversely, fitting a single shared model to the full data set relies on imputation which often leads to biased results when missingness depends on unobserved factors. We propose an alternative approach, called sharing pattern submodels, which i) makes predictions that are robust to missing values at test time, ii) maintains or improves the predictive power of pattern submodels, and iii) has a short description, enabling improved interpretability. Parameter sharing is enforced through sparsity-inducing regularization which we prove leads to consistent estimation. Finally, we give conditions for when a sharing model is optimal, even when both missingness and the target outcome depend on unobserved variables. Classification and regression experiments on synthetic and real-world data sets demonstrate that our models achieve a favorable tradeoff between pattern specialization and information sharing.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 48 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2022.
Builds on
10 of 48 references.
References · 10
- 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
- 2016Recurrent Neural Networks for Multivariate Time Series with Missing Valuescited by 548
- 2018Handling Incomplete Heterogeneous Data using VAEscited by 148
- 2021What's a good imputation to predict with missing values?cited by 61
- 2020Linear predictor on linearly-generated data with missing values: non consistency and solutionscited by 20
- 2019Identification In Missing Data Models Represented By Directed Acyclic Graphscited by 19
- 2013What Is Meant by "Missing at Random"?cited by 16
- 2017Interpreting Classifiers through Attribute Interactions in Datasetscited by 8
- 2019Robust Prediction when Features are Missingcited by 5
- 2017Missing Data and Predictioncited by 1
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 2; 2025: 2; 2026: 2.
7 papers.
- 2024Interpretable Generalized Additive Models for Datasets with Missing Valuescited by 6
- 2025Leveraging Predictive Equivalence in Decision Treescited by 4
- 2023MINTY: Rule-based Models that Minimize the Need for Imputing Features with Missing Valuescited by 3
- 2024HgbNet: predicting hemoglobin level/anemia degree from EHR datacited by 1
- 2026Distribution Shift in Missing Data Imputation: A Risk-Based Perspective and Importance-Weighted Correction under MARcited by 1
- 2025Prediction Models That Learn to Avoid Missing Valuescited by 0
- 2026Hypernetworks for Dynamic Feature Selectioncited by 0
- 2026Hypernetworks for Dynamic Feature Selection12 May 2026
- 2026Distribution Shift in Missing Data Imputation: A Risk-Based Perspective and Importance-Weighted Correction under MAR6 Feb 2026
- 2025Leveraging Predictive Equivalence in Decision Trees17 Jun 2025
- 2025Prediction Models That Learn to Avoid Missing Values6 May 2025
- 2024Interpretable Generalized Additive Models for Datasets with Missing Values3 Dec 2024
- 2024HgbNet: predicting hemoglobin level/anemia degree from EHR data22 Jan 2024
- 2023MINTY: Rule-based Models that Minimize the Need for Imputing Features with Missing Values23 Nov 2023