A Unified and Biologically-Plausible Relational Graph Representation of Vision Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Vision transformer (ViT) and its variants have achieved remarkable successes in various visual tasks. The key characteristic of these ViT models is to adopt different aggregation strategies of spatial patch information within the artificial neural networks (ANNs). However, there is still a key lack of unified representation of different ViT architectures for systematic understanding and assessment of model representation performance. Moreover, how those well-performing ViT ANNs are similar to real biological neural networks (BNNs) is largely unexplored. To answer these fundamental questions, we, for the first time, propose a unified and biologically-plausible relational graph representation of ViT models. Specifically, the proposed relational graph representation consists of two key sub-graphs: aggregation graph and affine graph. The former one considers ViT tokens as nodes and describes their spatial interaction, while the latter one regards network channels as nodes and reflects the information communication between channels. Using this unified relational graph representation, we found that: a) a sweet spot of the aggregation graph leads to ViTs with significantly improved predictive performance; b) the graph measures of clustering coefficient and average path length are two effective indicators of model prediction performance, especially when applying on the datasets with small samples; c) our findings are consistent across various ViT architectures and multiple datasets; d) the proposed relational graph representation of ViT has high similarity with real BNNs derived from brain science data. Overall, our work provides a novel unified and biologically-plausible paradigm for more interpretable and effective representation of ViT ANNs.
Key facts. Cited by 7 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 27 of its 55 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 May 2022.
Builds on
27 of 55 references.
References · 27
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 59,932
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 29,915
- 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,084
- 2021Swin Transformer: Hierarchical Vision Transformer using Shifted Windowscited by 12,082
- 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,441
- 2020Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentioncited by 4,560
- 2019RandAugment: Practical automated data augmentation with a reduced search spacecited by 2,261
- 2017Improved Regularization of Convolutional Neural Networks with Cutoutcited by 1,623
- 2021MLP-Mixer: An all-MLP Architecture for Visioncited by 1,441
- 2021Scaling Vision Transformerscited by 993
- 2021Towards a Unified View of Parameter-Efficient Transfer Learningcited by 863
- 2021CrossViT: Cross-Attention Multi-Scale Vision Transformer for Image Classificationcited by 806
15 more
- 2021Do Vision Transformers See Like Convolutional Neural Networks?cited by 671
- 2021ImageNet-21K Pretraining for the Massescited by 607
- 2021MetaFormer Is Actually What You Need for Visioncited by 523
- 2020Temporal Graph Networks for Deep Learning on Dynamic Graphscited by 521
- 2021ResMLP: Feedforward networks for image classification with data-efficient trainingcited by 338
- 2022UniFormer: Unifying Convolution and Self-attention for Visual Recognitioncited by 206
- 2021Patch Slimming for Efficient Vision Transformerscited by 131
- 2019Exploring Randomly Wired Neural Networks for Image Recognitioncited by 103
- 2021Shunted Self-Attention via Multi-Scale Token Aggregationcited by 90
- 2020Graph Structure of Neural Networkscited by 67
- 2020Few-shot Medical Image Segmentation using a Global Correlation Network with Discriminative Embeddingcited by 48
- 2017The brain as an efficient and robust adaptive learnercited by 11
- 2019How humans learn and represent networkscited by 10
- 2021RAN-GNNs: breaking the capacity limits of graph neural networkscited by 3
- 2017Individual Differences in Learning Social and Non-Social Network Structurescited by 2
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 3; 2024: 0; 2025: 2; 2026: 1.
7 papers.
- 2023Review of Large Vision Models and Visual Prompt Engineeringcited by 77
- 2023When Brain-inspired AI Meets AGIcited by 54
- 2023SAMAug: Point Prompt Augmentation for Segment Anything Modelcited by 38
- 2025A Survey of Representation Learning, Optimization Strategies, and Applications for Omnidirectional Visioncited by 23
- 2022Rectify ViT Shortcut Learning by Visual Saliencycited by 14
- 2025A Unified Geometric Space for Topological Alignment Between Transformer-Based Models and Human Brain Networkscited by 0
- 2026Fragment-Aware Vision Transformers for Fresco-Fragment Style Classificationcited by 0
- 2026Fragment-Aware Vision Transformers for Fresco-Fragment Style Classification17 Sep 2026
- 2025A Unified Geometric Space for Topological Alignment Between Transformer-Based Models and Human Brain Networks28 Oct 2025
- 2025A Survey of Representation Learning, Optimization Strategies, and Applications for Omnidirectional Vision11 Feb 2025
- 2023SAMAug: Point Prompt Augmentation for Segment Anything Model3 Jul 2023
- 2023Review of Large Vision Models and Visual Prompt Engineering3 Jul 2023
- 2023When Brain-inspired AI Meets AGI28 Mar 2023
- 2022Rectify ViT Shortcut Learning by Visual Saliency17 Jun 2022