mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Deep Reinforcement Learning for Turbulence Modeling in Large Eddy Simulations

arXiv 2206.11038 ↗First posted 21 Jun 2022physics.flu-dyn cs.AI cs.CEcited by 16

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Over the last years, supervised learning (SL) has established itself as the state-of-the-art for data-driven turbulence modeling. In the SL paradigm, models are trained based on a dataset, which is typically computed a priori from a high-fidelity solution by applying the respective filter function, which separates the resolved and the unresolved flow scales. For implicitly filtered large eddy simulation (LES), this approach is infeasible, since here, the employed discretization itself acts as an implicit filter function. As a consequence, the exact filter form is generally not known and thus, the corresponding closure terms cannot be computed even if the full solution is available. The reinforcement learning (RL) paradigm can be used to avoid this inconsistency by training not on a previously obtained training dataset, but instead by interacting directly with the dynamical LES environment itself. This allows to incorporate the potentially complex implicit LES filter into the training process by design. In this work, we apply a reinforcement learning framework to find an optimal eddy-viscosity for implicitly filtered large eddy simulations of forced homogeneous isotropic turbulence. For this, we formulate the task of turbulence modeling as an RL task with a policy network based on convolutional neural networks that adapts the eddy-viscosity in LES dynamically in space and time based on the local flow state only. We demonstrate that the trained models can provide long-term stable simulations and that they outperform established analytical models in terms of accuracy. In addition, the models generalize well to other resolutions and discretizations. We thus demonstrate that RL can provide a framework for consistent, accurate and stable turbulence modeling especially for implicitly filtered LES.

Key facts. Cited by 16 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 21 Jun 2022.

Builds on

14 of 46 references.

References · 14

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2017Proximal Policy Optimization Algorithmscited by 15,215
  3. 2019A Comprehensive Survey on Graph Neural Networkscited by 2,919
  4. 2016Group Equivariant Convolutional Networkscited by 1,165
  5. 2019Machine Learning for Fluid Mechanicscited by 385
  6. 2016Learning Convolutional Neural Networks for Graphscited by 314
  7. 2021Scientific multi-agent reinforcement learning for wall-models of turbulent flowscited by 52
  8. 2018Deep Neural Networks for Data-Driven Turbulence Modelscited by 35
  9. 2020A Perspective on Machine Learning Methods in Turbulence Modellingcited by 23
  10. 2019FLEXI: A high order discontinuous Galerkin framework for hyperbolic-parabolic conservation lawscited by 7
  11. 2021Using Machine Learning at Scale in HPC Simulations with SmartSim: An Application to Ocean Climate Modelingcited by 7
  12. 2022Deep Reinforcement Learning for Computational Fluid Dynamics on HPC Systemscited by 7
2 more
  1. 2020A machine learning framework for LES closure termscited by 5
  2. 2020Deploying deep learning in OpenFOAM with TensorFlowcited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 5; 2024: 3; 2025: 5; 2026: 2.

16 papers.

Sort:

By area:

  1. 2022Improving aircraft performance using machine learning: a reviewcited by 19
  2. 2023Toward Discretization-Consistent Closure Schemes for Large Eddy Simulation Using Reinforcement Learningcited by 5
  3. 2023Gradient-free online learning of subgrid-scale dynamics with neural emulatorscited by 5
  4. 2024Advanced deep-reinforcement-learning methods for flow control: group-invariant and positional-encoding networks improve learning speed and qualitycited by 5
  5. 2023Gym-preCICE: Reinforcement Learning Environments for Active Flow Controlcited by 2
  6. 2023In Situ Framework for Coupling Simulation and Machine Learning with Application to CFDcited by 2
  7. 2023Extreme Event Prediction with Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning-based Parametrization of Atmospheric and Oceanic Turbulencecited by 2
  8. 2025Optimal Lattice Boltzmann Closures through Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learningcited by 2
  9. 2024Combining Machine Learning with Computational Fluid Dynamics using OpenFOAM and SmartSimcited by 1
  10. 2024Reinforcement learning for anisotropic p-adaptation and error estimation in high-order solverscited by 1
  11. 2025Invariant Control Strategies for Active Flow Control using Graph Neural Networkscited by 1
  12. 2025An Analytical and AI-discovered Stable, Accurate, and Generalizable Subgrid-scale Closure for Geophysical Turbulencecited by 1
4 more
  1. 2026Replacing Tunable Parameters in Weather and Climate Models with State-Dependent Functions using Reinforcement Learningcited by 1
  2. 2025Parameter-Aware Ensemble SINDy for Interpretable Symbolic SGS Closurecited by 0
  3. 2025Addressing A Posteriori Performance Degradation in Neural Network Subgrid Stress Modelscited by 0
  4. 2026Spectrally Regularized Latent Flow Matching for Turbulence Generationcited by 0