mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Evaluation of Embedding Models for Automatic Extraction and Classification of Acknowledged Entities in Scientific Documents

arXiv 2206.10939 ↗First posted 22 Jun 2022cs.CL cs.DLcited by 3

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Acknowledgments in scientific papers may give an insight into aspects of the scientific community, such as reward systems, collaboration patterns, and hidden research trends. The aim of the paper is to evaluate the performance of different embedding models for the task of automatic extraction and classification of acknowledged entities from the acknowledgment text in scientific papers. We trained and implemented a named entity recognition (NER) task using the Flair NLP-framework. The training was conducted using three default Flair NER models with two differently-sized corpora. The Flair Embeddings model trained on the larger training corpus showed the best accuracy of 0.77. Our model is able to recognize six entity types: funding agency, grant number, individuals, university, corporation and miscellaneous. The model works more precise for some entity types than the others, thus, individuals and grant numbers showed very good F1-Score over 0.9. Most of the previous works on acknowledgement analysis were limited by the manual evaluation of data and therefore by the amount of processed data. This model can be applied for the comprehensive analysis of the acknowledgement texts and may potentially make a great contribution to the field of automated acknowledgement analysis.

Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2022.

Builds on

7 of 27 references.

References · 7

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,266
  3. 2019SciBERT: A Pretrained Language Model for Scientific Textcited by 1,404
  4. 2020FLERT: Document-Level Features for Named Entity Recognitioncited by 45
  5. 2015The Journal Coverage of Web of Science and Scopus: a Comparative Analysiscited by 14
  6. 2020The Journal Coverage of Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions: A Comparative Analysiscited by 9
  7. 2017Making visible the invisible through the analysis of acknowledgements in the humanitiescited by 3

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2.

3 papers.