iTiger: An Automatic Issue Title Generation Tool
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In both commercial and open-source software, bug reports or issues are used to track bugs or feature requests. However, the quality of issues can differ a lot. Prior research has found that bug reports with good quality tend to gain more attention than the ones with poor quality. As an essential component of an issue, title quality is an important aspect of issue quality. Moreover, issues are usually presented in a list view, where only the issue title and some metadata are present. In this case, a concise and accurate title is crucial for readers to grasp the general concept of the issue and facilitate the issue triaging. Previous work formulated the issue title generation task as a one-sentence summarization task. A sequence-to-sequence model was employed to solve this task. However, it requires a large amount of domain-specific training data to attain good performance in issue title generation. Recently, pre-trained models, which learned knowledge from large-scale general corpora, have shown much success in software engineering tasks. In this work, we make the first attempt to fine-tune BART, which has been pre-trained using English corpora, to generate issue titles. We implemented the fine-tuned BART as a web tool named iTiger, which can suggest an issue title based on the issue description. iTiger is fine-tuned on 267,094 GitHub issues. We compared iTiger with the state-of-the-art method, i.e., iTAPE, on 33,438 issues. The automatic evaluation shows that iTiger outperforms iTAPE by 29.7%, 50.8%, and 34.1%, in terms of ROUGE-1, ROUGE-2, ROUGE-L F1-scores. The manual evaluation also demonstrates the titles generated by BART are preferred by evaluators over the titles generated by iTAPE in 72.7% of cases. Besides, the evaluators deem our tool as useful and easy-to-use. They are also interested to use our tool in the future.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 22 Jun 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 1; 2025: 1; 2026: 1.
4 papers.
- 2023Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities on Vulnerability Managementcited by 19
- 2025Teamwork makes the dream work: LLMs-Based Agents for GitHub README.MD Summarizationcited by 4
- 2024GIRT-Model: Automated Generation of Issue Report Templatescited by 2
- 2026Automated Summarization of Software Documents: An LLM-based Multi-Agent Approachcited by 1
- 2026Automated Summarization of Software Documents: An LLM-based Multi-Agent Approach23 Jun 2026
- 2025Teamwork makes the dream work: LLMs-Based Agents for GitHub README.MD Summarization13 Mar 2025
- 2024GIRT-Model: Automated Generation of Issue Report Templates4 Feb 2024
- 2023Exploring ChatGPT's Capabilities on Vulnerability Management11 Nov 2023