mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Practical Deepfake Detection: Vulnerabilities in Global Contexts

arXiv 2206.09842 ↗First posted 20 Jun 2022cs.CV cs.CYcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recent advances in deep learning have enabled realistic digital alterations to videos, known as deepfakes. This technology raises important societal concerns regarding disinformation and authenticity, galvanizing the development of numerous deepfake detection algorithms. At the same time, there are significant differences between training data and in-the-wild video data, which may undermine their practical efficacy. We simulate data corruption techniques and examine the performance of a state-of-the-art deepfake detection algorithm on corrupted variants of the FaceForensics++ dataset. While deepfake detection models are robust against video corruptions that align with training-time augmentations, we find that they remain vulnerable to video corruptions that simulate decreases in video quality. Indeed, in the controversial case of the video of Gabonese President Bongo's new year address, the algorithm, which confidently authenticates the original video, judges highly corrupted variants of the video to be fake. Our work opens up both technical and ethical avenues of exploration into practical deepfake detection in global contexts.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 20 Jun 2022.

Builds on

3 of 19 references.

References · 3

  1. 2019EfficientNet: Rethinking Model Scaling for Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 6,426
  2. 2019FaceForensics++: Learning to Detect Manipulated Facial Imagescited by 1,097
  3. 2019Recurrent Convolutional Strategies for Face Manipulation Detection in Videoscited by 118

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 1.

2 papers.