mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Machine Learning in Sports: A Case Study on Using Explainable Models for Predicting Outcomes of Volleyball Matches

arXiv 2206.09258 ↗First posted 18 Jun 2022cs.LG cs.AIcited by 1

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Machine Learning has become an integral part of engineering design and decision making in several domains, including sports. Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) have been the state-of-the-art methods for predicting outcomes of professional sports events. However, apart from getting highly accurate predictions on these sports events outcomes, it is necessary to answer questions such as "Why did the model predict that Team A would win Match X against Team B?" DNNs are inherently black-box in nature. Therefore, it is required to provide high-quality interpretable, and understandable explanations for a model's prediction in sports. This paper explores a two-phased Explainable Artificial Intelligence(XAI) approach to predict outcomes of matches in the Brazilian volleyball League (SuperLiga). In the first phase, we directly use the interpretable rule-based ML models that provide a global understanding of the model's behaviors based on Boolean Rule Column Generation (BRCG; extracts simple AND-OR classification rules) and Logistic Regression (LogReg; allows to estimate the feature importance scores). In the second phase, we construct non-linear models such as Support Vector Machine (SVM) and Deep Neural Network (DNN) to obtain predictive performance on the volleyball matches' outcomes. We construct the "post-hoc" explanations for each data instance using ProtoDash, a method that finds prototypes in the training dataset that are most similar to the test instance, and SHAP, a method that estimates the contribution of each feature on the model's prediction. We evaluate the SHAP explanations using the faithfulness metric. Our results demonstrate the effectiveness of the explanations for the model's predictions.

Key facts. Cited by 1 paper in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 18 Jun 2022.

Builds on

4 of 18 references.

References · 4

  1. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  2. 2018Towards Robust Interpretability with Self-Explaining Neural Networkscited by 505
  3. 2019One Explanation Does Not Fit All: A Toolkit and Taxonomy of AI Explainability Techniquescited by 164
  4. 2018Boolean Decision Rules via Column Generationcited by 80

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2025: 1.

1 paper.