mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Energy reconstruction for large liquid scintillator detectors with machine learning techniques: aggregated features approach

arXiv 2206.09040 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2022physics.ins-det cs.LGcited by 2

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Large-scale detectors consisting of a liquid scintillator target surrounded by an array of photo-multiplier tubes (PMTs) are widely used in the modern neutrino experiments: Borexino, KamLAND, Daya Bay, Double Chooz, RENO, and the upcoming JUNO with its satellite detector TAO. Such apparatuses are able to measure neutrino energy which can be derived from the amount of light and its spatial and temporal distribution over PMT channels. However, achieving a fine energy resolution in large-scale detectors is challenging. In this work, we present machine learning methods for energy reconstruction in the JUNO detector, the most advanced of its type. We focus on positron events in the energy range of 0-10 MeV which corresponds to the main signal in JUNO -- neutrinos originated from nuclear reactor cores and detected via the inverse beta decay channel. We consider the following models: Boosted Decision Trees and Fully Connected Deep Neural Network, trained on aggregated features, calculated using the information collected by PMTs. We describe the details of our feature engineering procedure and show that machine learning models can provide the energy resolution σ = 3% at 1 MeV using subsets of engineered features. The dataset for model training and testing is generated by the Monte Carlo method with the official JUNO software.

Key facts. Cited by 2 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2022.

Builds on

11 of 56 references.

References · 11

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 36,960
  2. 2016XGBoost: A Scalable Tree Boosting Systemcited by 5,120
  3. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,061
  4. 2016An overview of gradient descent optimization algorithmscited by 1,021
  5. 2017Self-Normalizing Neural Networkscited by 591
  6. 2021Deep Neural Networks and Tabular Data: A Surveycited by 489
  7. 2019An Exponential Learning Rate Schedule for Deep Learningcited by 121
  8. 2020A survey on modern trainable activation functionscited by 89
  9. 2021A Living Review of Machine Learning for Particle Physicscited by 77
  10. 2017An Empirical Analysis of Feature Engineering for Predictive Modelingcited by 29
  11. 2021Activation Functions in Artificial Neural Networks: A Systematic Overviewcited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

2 papers.