mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Making first order linear logic a generating grammar

arXiv 2206.08955 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2022cs.CL cs.LO math.LOcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

It is known that different categorial grammars have surface representation in a fragment of first order multiplicative linear logic (MLL1). We show that the fragment of interest is equivalent to the recently introduced extended tensor type calculus (ETTC). ETTC is a calculus of specific typed terms, which represent tuples of strings, more precisely bipartite graphs decorated with strings. Types are derived from linear logic formulas, and rules correspond to concrete operations on these string-labeled graphs, so that they can be conveniently visualized. This provides the above mentioned fragment of MLL1 that is relevant for language modeling not only with some alternative syntax and intuitive geometric representation, but also with an intrinsic deductive system, which has been absent. In this work we consider a non-trivial notationally enriched variation of the previously introduced ETTC, which allows more concise and transparent computations. We present both a cut-free sequent calculus and a natural deduction formalism.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 18 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2022.

Builds on

5 of 18 references.

References · 5

  1. 2013Extended Lambek calculi and first-order linear logiccited by 2
  2. 2014Hybrid Type-Logical Grammars, First-Order Linear Logic and the Descriptive Inadequacy of Lambda Grammarscited by 2
  3. 2020On embedding Lambek calculus into commutative categorial grammarscited by 2
  4. 2021Cobordisms and commutative categorial grammarscited by 2
  5. 2015Comparing and evaluating extended Lambek calculicited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.