mlsanityData to 13 Oct 2026

Federated learning with incremental clustering for heterogeneous data

arXiv 2206.08752 ↗First posted 17 Jun 2022cs.LGcited by 4

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Federated learning enables different parties to collaboratively build a global model under the orchestration of a server while keeping the training data on clients' devices. However, performance is affected when clients have heterogeneous data. To cope with this problem, we assume that despite data heterogeneity, there are groups of clients who have similar data distributions that can be clustered. In previous approaches, in order to cluster clients the server requires clients to send their parameters simultaneously. However, this can be problematic in a context where there is a significant number of participants that may have limited availability. To prevent such a bottleneck, we propose FLIC (Federated Learning with Incremental Clustering), in which the server exploits the updates sent by clients during federated training instead of asking them to send their parameters simultaneously. Hence no additional communications between the server and the clients are necessary other than what classical federated learning requires. We empirically demonstrate for various non-IID cases that our approach successfully splits clients into groups following the same data distributions. We also identify the limitations of FLIC by studying its capability to partition clients at the early stages of the federated learning process efficiently. We further address attacks on models as a form of data heterogeneity and empirically show that FLIC is a robust defense against poisoning attacks even when the proportion of malicious clients is higher than 50%.

Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 23 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 17 Jun 2022.

Builds on

18 of 23 references.

References · 18

  1. 2016Communication-Efficient Learning of Deep Networks from Decentralized Datacited by 7,653
  2. 2019Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learningcited by 3,040
  3. 2018Federated Optimization in Heterogeneous Networkscited by 2,981
  4. 2018Federated Learning with Non-IID Datacited by 1,106
  5. 2018Byzantine-Robust Distributed Learning: Towards Optimal Statistical Ratescited by 708
  6. 2017Federated Multi-Task Learningcited by 670
  7. 2018Federated Learning for Mobile Keyboard Predictioncited by 572
  8. 2020An Efficient Framework for Clustered Federated Learningcited by 508
  9. 2019Clustered Federated Learning: Model-Agnostic Distributed Multi-Task Optimization under Privacy Constraintscited by 502
  10. 2018The Hidden Vulnerability of Distributed Learning in Byzantiumcited by 326
  11. 2019The Non-IID Data Quagmire of Decentralized Machine Learningcited by 304
  12. 2019Improving Federated Learning Personalization via Model Agnostic Meta Learningcited by 268
6 more
  1. 2020Federated learning with hierarchical clustering of local updates to improve training on non-IID datacited by 223
  2. 2021Federated Multi-Task Learning under a Mixture of Distributionscited by 191
  3. 2019FedHealth: A Federated Transfer Learning Framework for Wearable Healthcarecited by 182
  4. 2020Salvaging Federated Learning by Local Adaptationcited by 142
  5. 2022ProxSkip: Yes! Local Gradient Steps Provably Lead to Communication Acceleration! Finally!cited by 134
  6. 2021Challenges and Approaches for Mitigating Byzantine Attacks in Federated Learningcited by 47

Built on by

Cited by year

Citing papers per year: 2023: 2; 2024: 1; 2025: 1.

4 papers.