Bayesian conjugacy in probit, tobit, multinomial probit and extensions: A review and new results
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A broad class of models that routinely appear in several fields can be expressed as partially or fully discretized Gaussian linear regressions. Besides including basic Gaussian response settings, this class also encompasses probit, multinomial probit and tobit regression, among others, thereby yielding to one of the most widely-implemented families of models in applications. The relevance of such representations has stimulated decades of research in the Bayesian field, mostly motivated by the fact that, unlike for Gaussian linear regression, the posterior distribution induced by such models does not seem to belong to a known class, under the commonly-assumed Gaussian priors for the coefficients. This has motivated several solutions for posterior inference relying on sampling-based strategies or on deterministic approximations that, however, still experience computational and accuracy issues, especially in high dimensions. The scope of this article is to review, unify and extend recent advances in Bayesian inference and computation for this class of models. To address such a goal, we prove that the likelihoods induced by these formulations share a common analytical structure that implies conjugacy with a broad class of distributions, namely the unified skew-normals (SUN), that generalize Gaussians to skewed contexts. This result unifies and extends recent conjugacy properties for specific models within the class analyzed, and opens avenues for improved posterior inference, under a broader class of formulations and priors, via novel closed-form expressions, i.i.d. samplers from the exact SUN posteriors, and more accurate and scalable approximations from VB and EP. Such advantages are illustrated in simulations and are expected to facilitate the routine-use of these core Bayesian models, while providing a novel framework to study theoretical properties and develop future extensions.
Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 13 Oct 2026). First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2022.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2023: 4; 2024: 0; 2025: 4; 2026: 1.
9 papers.
- 2025High-dimensional Bayesian Tobit regression for censored response with Horseshoe priorcited by 4
- 2023Sparse Bayesian Multidimensional Item Response Theorycited by 3
- 2025Mixing times of data-augmentation Gibbs samplers for high-dimensional probit regressioncited by 2
- 2023Efficient expectation propagation for posterior approximation in high-dimensional probit modelscited by 0
- 2023Efficient computation of predictive probabilities in probit models via expectation propagationcited by 0
- 2023Expectation propagation for the smoothing distribution in dynamic probitcited by 0
- 2025Approximate Bayesian inference for cumulative probit regression modelscited by 0
- 2025BaGGLS: A Bayesian Shrinkage Framework for Interpretable Modeling of Interactions in High-Dimensional Biological Datacited by 0
- 2026Mean-field Variational Bayes for Sparse Probit Regressioncited by 0
- 2026Mean-field Variational Bayes for Sparse Probit Regression29 Jan 2026
- 2025BaGGLS: A Bayesian Shrinkage Framework for Interpretable Modeling of Interactions in High-Dimensional Biological Data19 Nov 2025
- 2025Approximate Bayesian inference for cumulative probit regression models10 Nov 2025
- 2025Mixing times of data-augmentation Gibbs samplers for high-dimensional probit regression20 May 2025
- 2025High-dimensional Bayesian Tobit regression for censored response with Horseshoe prior13 May 2025
- 2023Sparse Bayesian Multidimensional Item Response Theory26 Oct 2023
- 2023Expectation propagation for the smoothing distribution in dynamic probit4 Sep 2023
- 2023Efficient computation of predictive probabilities in probit models via expectation propagation4 Sep 2023
- 2023Efficient expectation propagation for posterior approximation in high-dimensional probit models4 Sep 2023