DIALOG-22 RuATD Generated Text Detection
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Text Generation Models (TGMs) succeed in creating text that matches human language style reasonably well. Detectors that can distinguish between TGM-generated text and human-written ones play an important role in preventing abuse of TGM. In this paper, we describe our pipeline for the two DIALOG-22 RuATD tasks: detecting generated text (binary task) and classification of which model was used to generate text (multiclass task). We achieved 1st place on the binary classification task with an accuracy score of 0.82995 on the private test set and 4th place on the multiclass classification task with an accuracy score of 0.62856 on the private test set. We proposed an ensemble method of different pre-trained models based on the attention mechanism.
Key facts. Cited by 3 papers in the map (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 16 Jun 2022.
Builds on
14 of 17 references.
References · 14
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,204
- 2019Unsupervised Cross-lingual Representation Learning at Scalecited by 3,907
- 2017A Broad-Coverage Challenge Corpus for Sentence Understanding through Inferencecited by 2,665
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,219
- 2020Multilingual Denoising Pre-training for Neural Machine Translationcited by 1,028
- 2018XNLI: Evaluating Cross-lingual Sentence Representationscited by 913
- 2019CCNet: Extracting High Quality Monolingual Datasets from Web Crawl Datacited by 544
- 2019Release Strategies and the Social Impacts of Language Modelscited by 505
- 2019GLTR: Statistical Detection and Visualization of Generated Textcited by 490
- 2019Automatic Detection of Generated Text is Easiest when Humans are Fooledcited by 260
- 2020Automatic Detection of Machine Generated Text: A Critical Surveycited by 160
- 2020RoFT: A Tool for Evaluating Human Detection of Machine-Generated Textcited by 36
2 more
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2022: 1; 2023: 2.
3 papers.