mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Semi-Autoregressive Energy Flows: Exploring Likelihood-Free Training of Normalizing Flows

arXiv 2206.06672 ↗First posted 14 Jun 2022cs.LG stat.MLcited by 9

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Training normalizing flow generative models can be challenging due to the need to calculate computationally expensive determinants of Jacobians. This paper studies the likelihood-free training of flows and proposes the energy objective, an alternative sample-based loss based on proper scoring rules. The energy objective is determinant-free and supports flexible model architectures that are not easily compatible with maximum likelihood training, including semi-autoregressive energy flows, a novel model family that interpolates between fully autoregressive and non-autoregressive models. Energy flows feature competitive sample quality, posterior inference, and generation speed relative to likelihood-based flows; this performance is decorrelated from the quality of log-likelihood estimates, which are generally very poor. Our findings question the use of maximum likelihood as an objective or a metric, and contribute to a scientific study of its role in generative modeling.

Key facts. Cited by 9 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 29 of its 54 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 14 Jun 2022.

Builds on

29 of 54 references.

References · 29

  1. 2014Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimizationcited by 37,240
  2. 2014Deep Learning Face Attributes in the Wildcited by 3,693
  3. 2015Variational Inference with Normalizing Flowscited by 2,170
  4. 2016Density estimation using Real NVPcited by 2,042
  5. 2016WaveNet: A Generative Model for Raw Audiocited by 1,722
  6. 2018Glow: Generative Flow with Invertible 1x1 Convolutionscited by 1,545
  7. 2019Normalizing Flows for Probabilistic Modeling and Inferencecited by 1,323
  8. 2015Fast and Accurate Deep Network Learning by Exponential Linear Units (ELUs)cited by 1,070
  9. 2016Conditional Image Generation with PixelCNN Decoderscited by 862
  10. 2017Masked Autoregressive Flow for Density Estimationcited by 684
  11. 2016Improving Variational Inference with Inverse Autoregressive Flowcited by 640
  12. 2019Neural Spline Flowscited by 596
17 more
  1. 2018FFJORD: Free-form Continuous Dynamics for Scalable Reversible Generative Modelscited by 594
  2. 2019Sliced Score Matching: A Scalable Approach to Density and Score Estimationcited by 384
  3. 2018Invertible Residual Networkscited by 365
  4. 2015Generative Moment Matching Networkscited by 257
  5. 2018Neural Autoregressive Flowscited by 208
  6. 2019Generalized Sliced Wasserstein Distancescited by 208
  7. 2015Training generative neural networks via Maximum Mean Discrepancy optimizationcited by 151
  8. 2017The Cramer Distance as a Solution to Biased Wasserstein Gradientscited by 119
  9. 2019Unconstrained Monotonic Neural Networkscited by 92
  10. 2020SurVAE Flows: Surjections to Bridge the Gap between VAEs and Flowscited by 71
  11. 2020Distributional Sliced-Wasserstein and Applications to Generative Modelingcited by 69
  12. 2021Rectangular Flows for Manifold Learningcited by 50
  13. 2022A Tale of Two Flows: Cooperative Learning of Langevin Flow and Normalizing Flow Toward Energy-Based Modelcited by 44
  14. 2019Hybrid Models with Deep and Invertible Featurescited by 41
  15. 2020Invertible Generative Modeling using Linear Rational Splinescited by 40
  16. 2021Autoregressive Quantile Flows for Predictive Uncertainty Estimationcited by 15
  17. 2020Self Normalizing Flowscited by 12

Built on by

Cited by year (2026 to 14 Oct)

Citing papers per year: 2023: 1; 2024: 4; 2025: 3; 2026: 1.

9 papers.