Revisiting the Shape-Bias of Deep Learning for Dermoscopic Skin Lesion Classification
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
It is generally believed that the human visual system is biased towards the recognition of shapes rather than textures. This assumption has led to a growing body of work aiming to align deep models' decision-making processes with the fundamental properties of human vision. The reliance on shape features is primarily expected to improve the robustness of these models under covariate shift. In this paper, we revisit the significance of shape-biases for the classification of skin lesion images. Our analysis shows that different skin lesion datasets exhibit varying biases towards individual image features. Interestingly, despite deep feature extractors being inclined towards learning entangled features for skin lesion classification, individual features can still be decoded from this entangled representation. This indicates that these features are still represented in the learnt embedding spaces of the models, but not used for classification. In addition, the spectral analysis of different datasets shows that in contrast to common visual recognition, dermoscopic skin lesion classification, by nature, is reliant on complex feature combinations beyond shape-bias. As a natural consequence, shifting away from the prevalent desire of shape-biasing models can even improve skin lesion classifiers in some cases.
Key facts. Cited by 4 papers in the map (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 10 of its 34 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2022.
Builds on
10 of 34 references.
References · 10
- 2013Intriguing properties of neural networkscited by 5,155
- 2014Sequence to Sequence Learning with Neural Networkscited by 2,986
- 2018ImageNet-trained CNNs are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustnesscited by 1,432
- 2019Adversarial Examples Are Not Bugs, They Are Featurescited by 953
- 2022Last Layer Re-Training is Sufficient for Robustness to Spurious Correlationscited by 381
- 2021A Fourier-based Framework for Domain Generalizationcited by 290
- 2019A Fourier Perspective on Model Robustness in Computer Visioncited by 288
- 2021Amplitude-Phase Recombination: Rethinking Robustness of Convolutional Neural Networks in Frequency Domaincited by 71
- 2021Boundary-aware Transformers for Skin Lesion Segmentationcited by 39
- 2020Towards Frequency-Based Explanation for Robust CNNcited by 29
Built on by
Citing papers per year: 2024: 2; 2025: 2.
4 papers.
- 2025ImageNet-trained CNNs are not biased towards texture: Revisiting feature reliance through controlled suppressioncited by 13
- 2024A Systematic Review of Generalization Research in Medical Image Classificationcited by 8
- 2024DocXplain: A Novel Model-Agnostic Explainability Method for Document Image Classificationcited by 4
- 2025DocVCE: Diffusion-based Visual Counterfactual Explanations for Document Image Classificationcited by 0
- 2025ImageNet-trained CNNs are not biased towards texture: Revisiting feature reliance through controlled suppression24 Sep 2025
- 2025DocVCE: Diffusion-based Visual Counterfactual Explanations for Document Image Classification6 Aug 2025
- 2024DocXplain: A Novel Model-Agnostic Explainability Method for Document Image Classification4 Jul 2024
- 2024A Systematic Review of Generalization Research in Medical Image Classification18 Mar 2024