mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Introducing Proof Tree Automata and Proof Tree Graphs

arXiv 2206.06294 ↗First posted 13 Jun 2022cs.LO cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In structural proof theory, designing and working on large calculi make it difficult to get intuitions about each rule individually and as part of a whole system. We introduce two novel tools to help working on calculi using the approach of graph theory and automata theory. The first tool is a Proof Tree Automaton (PTA): a tree automaton which language is the derivation language of a calculus. The second tool is a graphical representation of a calculus called Proof Tree Graph (PTG). In this directed hypergraph, vertices are sets of terms (e.g. sequents) and hyperarcs are rules. We explore properties of PTA and PTGs and how they relate to each other. We show that we can decompose a PTA as a partial map from a calculus to a traditional tree automaton. We formulate that statement in the theory of refinement systems. Finally, we compare our framework to proof nets and string diagrams.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 3 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 13 Jun 2022.

Builds on

3 of 27 references.

References · 3

  1. 2020Putting a Spin on Language: A Quantum Interpretation of Unary Connectives for Linguistic Applicationscited by 2
  2. 2016Linear Logic Properly Displayedcited by 1
  3. 2020Lambek-Grishin Calculus: Focusing, Display and Full Polarizationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.